You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Forking out the largest stake on a stake based system shifts power to who?
I know it might need 1000 “average” accounts to balance freedom’s votes...
I am not against bots, I just don’t like the fact that those who run them are witnesses...
Is that what we really want / need from our witnesses?
The problem isn't really even that they are witnesses running bots as much as they are witnesses running bots who are top witnesses because of their main delegator.
I actually think that this is exactly the problem Taraz...
You see, if witnesses (and I mean all of them) didn't run bots, freedom's votes would have probably been casted with different criteria...I think you know what I mean
There is freedom of action for witnesses to to some extent as they also have stake. The issue is that without Stincs stake, all top 30 are locked up and, distribution is almost entirely dependent on Freedom alone with no way to counteract it. I don't think it decentralizes it much.