Of course, we are closest to the bearers of

Of course, we are closest to the bearers of Russian culture, so the impersonalism that rules itself in Russia in general, there we can say that in Russia it is personalism is different and by the way, now it's in history that this term characterizes the various positions of various Russian philosophers who are Well let's say this does not directly develop the topic Well versalink Florensky for example Solovyov personalism personal Dostoevsky analysis Dostoevsky there certainly personalism This is likely as such a static trend is directed th direction of the sense that Berdiansky personalism, he pretty much turned out to be, and he is someone atonal irrational doctrine where, of course, in the presence it is about the person as a complex phenomenon that we will not be able to do that the identification does not quite fit there So we are used to treating it in Contact person Personality is, let's say, the beginnings of human actions to the bearer of the spirit to the subject that this spirit in social experience speaks modern language is precisely characterized Yes and it is precisely we want that it is personal but because he is able to look at the world by some special super-driven look, he as a person is connected with God, and he as a person is able not only as an action. Yes, he is capable of creativity, he is capable of transforming the surrounding world and himself as part of it. it can be said that the Personality is this here within the framework of such religious personalism is 2 of the boxes