You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: 100 DAYS OF STEEM : Day 33 - Tackling Abuse on Steem - Part I - What is Abuse?
In the past, Steemitinc delegated 4.3 million Steem Power to projects that fought against abuse. Spaminator and steemcleaners.
I think it should never be given power to the individual. Like the past.
The reason I like this Steemit curator system is that Steemit.inc manages the curator account, not delegates to STEEM Power.
If Steemit.inc delegates STEEM Power to someone to empower like before, it is very likely that they will abuse it. Eventually, it works for profit.
If a Downvote is required, the account must be managed by Steemit.inc the same as Curator account.
I feel you, and the ideal scenario is probably that they own the account so there is a minimum risk of abuse.
We can´t expect Stinc to go after every type of abuse, I hope they are going to use the precious time to work on improvements.
Therefore a small team of the community should be given the role and keys to an account. We can tackle the abusers ourselves, we only need the tools (read SP)
The small abusing that occurs in some communities can respond to the community as you say.
If steemi.inc allows downvoting to a curator account, i think this can be easily solved.
We believe that the abusing problem we need to solve now is large, so we need more than 3 million SP.
I'm negative about someone managing an account with such a big SP.