RE: 100 DAYS OF STEEM : Day 25 - Weekly Writing Challenge #4
100 DAYS OF STEEM is a good system for Steemit to communicate with users.
Weekly Writing Challenge is helping users participate and act on steemit through rewards.
These are very good for Steemit development.
But now STEEM is not solving the big problem.
Abusing is growing rapidly, and users who mining STEEM through comments continue to increase.
Several teams are trying to solve the problem through Downvote, but the community is not able to solve it.
https://tool.steem.world/Post/TopPendingPayouts
Check the link.
It is difficult for many Steemit users to earn more than 5$ even if they post hard work.
But what about these users?
They are taking hundreds of dollars a day as rewards.
When these rewards disappear, more users can make rewards and participate in steemit.
How is the trending post changing?
People started buying voting again.
Buying voting is similar to mining a STEEM. If there is no response, the trending post page will soon be full of voting buyers.
STEEM is going back to the past.
We know there are a lot of problems to solve.
Please try to solve these problems as soon as possible.
That list is very interesting. There are some current top witnesses in it.
Some abusers may be obvious, some not so . And some would be debatable.
We are interested to explore ways to find out what the community considers is acceptable and what is not.
This is definitely an area we are currently looking at, and want to find solutions that are acceptable to everyone or least the largest majority.
Thank you
The Steemit Team
i totally agree
Unfortunately this cannot be changed to a decentralized system. The abuse has always existed. It would only be possible to block such accounts. But maybe Steemit inc. should go the way and really block such accounts. Only that the reward + curation part is sent to zero. That would do it. Freezing the assets on the account would not go over well.
Unfortunately, Steemcleaners also abused the system and they had only enriched themselves with comments by voting for them.
Steemcleaners are a prime example of failure.
Managing users who exploit the system could be nice if it could be done through voting like SPS.
We are interested in all possible solutions.