SEC S20W4 || Hematología [Anemias Etiopatogénicas - Módulo 4] - Summary
We are here to present our summary for the 4th week of SEC20.
Firstly, we are very thankful to the Steemit Team, who honored us with this opportunity. Secondly, we are thankful to our students who attended our class enthusiastically. I'm sure they have learned a lot in the hematology course. The good thing is that we received 18 entries this week. This shows the enthusiasm of Steemians.
We hope you are enjoying our fifth week of class as well.
Our fourth class was about SEC S20W4 - Hematología - Anemias Etiopatogénicas - Módulo 4. In this course, students learned about Etiopathogenic Anemias in detail.
In this way, they have learned the basic definition of etiopathogenic anemias and try to related the concept of IPR with it. Mostly students couldn't relate it with IPR. But some students presented outclass. In this class, they also learned that the lack of vitamin B12 can suggest megaloblastic anemia, however the students tend to think that the type of aregenerative anemias are more dangerous, since they may be due to deformations or defects in the bone marrow.
Excellent, the students did a great job explaining and making the diagram, and they did it in a very creative way! And they came to learn that when complete maturation does not occur, we have an excess of immature red blood cells, better known as reticulocytes.
They did a great job mentioning the differences between each of these anemias, the Howell Jolly bodies are an important and very relevant detail in that classification. It's good that they mentioned IPR percentage. The most worrying aspect of both is the hypoproliferative aspect, since when a decrease is seen it could be the bone marrow itself having problems with reticulocyte production.
In the last question they were asked recommendation for emergency. They tried to mention each important part of bleeding in the emergency room, each home or clinic. That was the idea, that you can recommend tips that can be helpful to others. Some students couldn't understand what actually we want in this question.
There were a total of 18 participants. 17 entries were valid. 1 entry was invalid because he got only 2.5 marks. We feel strongly that Steemians must be active and post regularly to be winners. There are almost same students who are participating. As you all know we preferred quality content.
If Some users are winner in the last week, they can be winner in the week after week. But don't forget quality is always appreciated. When it's difficult to pick a winner , we go for those who are with us from the very start. Who are regularly attending our courses. Be attentive to attend most of the classes. Thank you in advance.
Congratulations to all of you 18 gems. You all did your task very well. The good news is that you all can qualify for Certificate except one who got only 2.5, At the end of the course, but don't forget, you all should complete our maximum tasks (At least 4 classes out of 6). A lot of appreciation for all of you 18 students. Wish you good luck for Week 5.
Here is the list of top 5 winners.
Place | Users | Link | Rating |
---|---|---|---|
1st | @sammy1109 | link | 9.1 |
2nd | @alexanderpeace | link | 9.1 |
3rd | @ahumadaliliana29 | link | 9.1 |
4th | @jollymonoara | link | 8.9 |
5th | @pea07 | link | 8.7 |
Thank you all of you! Here is the week 5 🩸👉 SEC S20W5 - Hematology - Hemolytic Anemias - Module 5.
There are other interesting entries that you can read just by searching for this tag #hematology-s20w4. Don't discourage yourself, just imagine, it might be your turn this week to just do your best. You noticed we prefer quality content. Thank you all! Happy learning Ahead!
Primero que nada, la calificación la realiza @aaliarubab pero yo paso a ver si hay errores en su revisión (porque soy la profesora principal). Los objetivos de la pregunta (en la calificación que fue modificada) eran que el estudiante pudiera relacionar el concepto de anemias etiopatogénicas con el concepto de IPR y su clasificación.
Al revisar tu publicación pude notar que los mencionaste nada más, no relacionaste el concepto (debías decirnos con tus palabras cuales porcentajes son indicados para cada anemia, regenerativa o arregenerativa). Fue por eso que en lugar de 2.5 le dije a Aalia que colocara 2.0 en la revisión de la primera pregunta.
Y en la tercera pregunta (calificación que paso de 2.0 a 1.5 puntos) fue porque para las diferencias exigimos que los estudiantes realizaran un cuadro comparativo, además que los cuadros comparativos ayudan a los estudiantes a fijar mejor las diferencias entre cada concepto.
Siempre intento revisar las calificaciones que damos antes de dar el veredicto, si hay errores en las verificaciones los editamos y eso no tiene ningún problema, además recuerde que @aaliarubab es mi asistente, ella revisa y yo tengo que revisar lo que ella califica.
que tenga buen día @iqrarana786
Upvoted! Thank you for supporting witness @jswit.
Congratulations to all the winners and many thanks to these team moderators for declaring me a winner. Very happy to have this and praying for everyone as a well wiser.
Thanks for the selection. Congratulations to all
Congratulations, your post has been upvoted by @scilwa, which is a curating account for @R2cornell's Discord Community. We can also be found on our hive community & peakd as well as on my Discord Server
Felicitaciones, su publication ha sido votado por @scilwa. También puedo ser encontrado en nuestra comunidad de colmena y Peakd así como en mi servidor de discordia
Felicidades al resto de ganadores y gracias por incluirme esta semana, saludos.