You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Notice Everyone - A War Is Coming - Pay Attention, Get Involved, And Make A Difference - NOW
My feelings exactly @glenalbrethsen. I don't know what the answer is either and, like you, I think it should be handled, but battle never ends well. And, it seems to go against the ethos of the platform. It reminds me of fighting wars in the name of religion. If Steemit is to be a leader in decentralised community then can't we come up with a better way than this to handle such things?
Seems to me there are many incredibly innovative and creative people here, surely there must be a better way. 😍
@Boom yes, @gillianpearce agreed!
And thank you @glenalbrethsen for your clarity in explaining the situation to us!
For me this comes down to a potential need for some way of maintaining high ethical standards within the community. And the need for an effective penalty such as the one facebook has of barring a person from posting for a period of time, or removing them completely.
I can see that the lure of financial gain for those tech savvy enough to exploit a decentralised platform like steemit is pretty seductive. Further I have a distaste for the whole upvoting bots, resteeming bots, paid for promoters. Surely we should have pride in our posts and our work should stand on it's own merits?
This is sounding a lot like the wild west posse to me...and although I personally deeply appreciate the principle of decentralisation..it does raise the question of how can governance be instituted without the formation of a governing body from within the community?
You state this very well and I agree with everything. It is a mechanism built into the system to all for decentralization. What you are witnessing in the wild west in a way as we are still new like the old west was.
In reality fulltimegeek has so much power it scared him and so he delegated it to others for the good of the community. He tried to do it right and recognized the harm of having too much power.
Unfortunately the bad guy here doens't have the same ethics and only cares about himself. Therefore there is only one solution, and that is the people with power have to either agree or not. They don't so there is a policing mechanism call "flagging" and that is what will happen. The problem with using flags is the other can hit you back. And this bad guy got so powerful that no one could challenge him any more...
Until today
fulltimegeek is bringing back the power that he has loaned out to people to get system back in balance. That is what is meant. The reason it is phrased as a war is that the bad guy will fight back and try to keep fulltimegeek from stopping him. No blood will be shed, but the future of the platform rests on the outcome, because if fulltimegeek loses then the bad guy will be unstoppable.
So your last question about governance is a good one, but the founders of the platform believed that good will win out over evil... We will see, but I think they were pretty smart to enable someone doing bad things to be stopped by the community at large.
Actually I think you will see that this is the better way. There won't be any blood shed, it will be one of the big guys bringing another big guy into line. It happens everyday. What makes this different, is that people have been upset for a long time and none of the whales did anything about it. And so the bad guy was able to build up tremendous power as a result. This is really just to fix that.