SteemSTEM Writing Competition - Sharing Knowledge on Steemit
Today we are announcing the first open SteemSTEM writing competition!
[Join us on #steemSTEM]
One of the goals of the SteemSTEM project is to promote learning. The best way to learn about a topic is often to teach it to others! Steem and Steemit provide us with the unique opportunity to get rewarded for such efforts, and the SteemSTEM initiative affords us the opportunity to further reward the best contributions!
What Am I Supposed To Write About?
The writing prompt for this round is open, so you can write about any topic you are interested in, as long as it is connected to the STEM fields. The only requirement is that YOU find the topic interesting, and think others could learn something by reading about it!
The Potential Prizes
- 1st Place - 100 Steem Power + 33% of Steem/SBD earned from this post (4.224 STEEM)
- 2nd Place - 50 Steem Power + 33% of Steem/SBD earned from this post (4.224 STEEM)
- 3rd Place - 25 Steem Power + 33% of Steem/SBD earned from this post (4.224 STEEM)
If you rank in the top three your post will be re-steemed in addition to the bonus monetary prize.
Three Simple Rules
- Be Nice
- Have Fun
- Cite ALL your sources
Entry
Entry is simple, just tag your post with the dedicated #steemstem-competition1 tag. To make sure your entry is noticed you can join the #SteemSTEM chat and let us know that you submitted a post.
Judging and Ranking
The jury assessing the quality of the posts will be comprised of three members of the SteemSTEM team, @anarchyhasnogods, @lemouth, and @justtryme90.
As with all aspects of the SteemSTEM project, the team is prohibited from participating. All the inputs come from the community and all of the rewards go back to the community!
We will each assign your post a score based on 4 guidelines.
- Accuracy - 15 pts
- Comprehensibility - 15 pts
- Formatting - 5 pts
- Appropriate citations and references - 5 pts
Accuracy
We will check for the scientific accuracy of your post. Remember that spreading inaccurate and/or false information leads to confusion for your readers!
Comprehensibility
We will rate on how easy it is to read and understand the text. Garbled text or text that is too technical can be hard to understand. Good scientific writing makes even complex topics seem simple.
Formatting
We will rate the post on how good it looks. People notice the formatting before the text. Large solid blocks of text are difficult to read and concentrate on, no matter the comprehensibility of the text. We are not looking for advanced formatting techniques, just basic, solid formatting.
Citations
Just citing your sources isn’t always enough. Listing the sources below the block of text you used them in can make it easier to follow what you got from where. The goal of citing information is not just to give credits, it also serves as a way for your readers to learn more if they are interested.
Remember science is a discipline focused on learning and discovery, we should all work to help others achieve that when they read what we write.
After evaluating each post, we (@steemstem) will leave a comment on it with the score and why we scored it like the way we did. We will post the results, emphasize the three top posts (together with the reasons why we have chosen them) once the contest will be over.
Entry starts Monday January 30th and ends Sunday February 5th, exactly one week. The results will be announced within the following week, unless there happens to be a major turnout.
Cool contest!! I will be amused to read the entries. I'll try to participate, but I wasn't planning anything "very scientific" for this week as I have to write my first scientific article. Let's see if I manage time during the weekend...at least I know I will read scientific stuff during the week. If I find anything worth of share I'll write a post to this competition! UP & RS
Remember, very scientific to you doesn't have to be the same as very scientific to me! Just a post about something interesting science related with nice citations.
Thanks a lot! I hope you will find something! :)
Really good thing that you try to support interesting texts which try to communicate science related topics.
If I will compete? Lets see ... I still hesitate as so far I consider steemit as pure free time and fun only. In life there are so many "competitions" anyway. :)
I am also not sure how detailed things should be presented. I guess that many readers actually prefer texts which are not too long and full of details.
But yes, great that you offer this!
And one question: One would have time until Sunday evening (any US time zone?) to submit it?
Yep, just submit including the indicated tag (it doesn't have to be the primary tag, just one of the 5 you use). Any time before Sunday 23:59 UTC.
Concerning the length of the post, anything is fine. It is up to you.
I feel I should (try to) contribute something as I really like this platform. Unfortunately the last days turned out to be very stressful (so far during the whole week I couldn't write anything interesting here; science or not). Maybe at the weekend I will attempt to write something - and if not possible I will try to contribute something to future competitions at least. :)
Exciting!
I will consider participating.
Thanks a lot! We are looking forward to read you :)
:)
I'm sure there will be an exiting multiverse of simple-complexity type content and it will all be a huge success!
I already see some posts. Are judges aloud to post?
We cannot post for the competition of course :)
Btw @lemouth, I see you are a particle physicist; can you provide some constructive criticism on this post?
https://steemit.com/science/@coloured-content/lessons-in-universal-law-lesson-two-the-law-of-mentalism
For some reasons, I missed this comment. I will have a look, but tomorrow. Now is too late (1AM) :D
Reading through all the tagged entries will be fun. I've resteemed this post to hopefully get a bit more exposure. Now to pick what topic I want to write about....
That's the first step :)
And thanks for the resteeming!
Great idea:)
Hmm, I sense an opportunity to talk about game theory...
Yes! Do it :)
I'll see if I can scrounge up enough time to make it happen!
This is a great idea and hopefully drives more people to write informative and science'y articles. I really like reading these. I might even have a bash myself!
Please do! Everyone (well except the judges) is welcome to participate! It would be awesome if you did too!
I shall get my thinking cap on :0)
This post has been ranked within the top 50 most undervalued posts in the second half of Jan 30. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $12.79 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.
See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Jan 30 - Part II. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.
If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.
Extra Steem bonus from this posts payout provide the top three authors with an additional 4.224 Steem, which will be directly sent to each winners account upon completion of the judging phase.