You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Human Longevity, SRT1, and Alzheimers Disease: A Brief Review of A Recent Publication
How long has it been since I saw you blogging science?^^
SIRT and related miRs seem to look promising indeed. I am however quite surprised that you can publish something like figure 1F in fucking Nature. I see just scattered data points, sorry. Probably they should have increased the sample size by a lot. But hey, Nature, so who cares? ;-P
Being newish, I didn't even see him blogging science until now :)
Hmm, I've been here for a long time. I was also one of the main science bloggers early on.
I was talking about myself. I am the new guy, this was actually my first vote for you.
Keep writing if you have time, I really enjoyed it!
I will, don't worry.
It's nature scientific reports, not nature :)
Less scrutiny. You don't like figure 1F? It's seriously what I would expect given the nature of the samples.
The fact that they weren't completely random scatter is significant IMO.
Now, should someone look for whether that weak ass correlation holds in like 1000 samples? Hell yeah, then we will know it's real. For now it's just a "hmm" sort of plot.