You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: GROUPTHINK - a systemic view on group decisions and consensus
It sounds like RCV (Ranked Choice Voting) - https://ballotpedia.org/Ranked-choice_voting_(RCV)
It sounds like RCV (Ranked Choice Voting) - https://ballotpedia.org/Ranked-choice_voting_(RCV)
No, it is the exact opposite of a preferential choice. With systemic consensus, you don't go for what you consider your favourite from several possibilities. You determine your resistance to every statement available for election. The proposal that expresses the least resistance in a number of all voters wins the election.
If Hans is the person from a class representative election to whom the whole class has the least resistance, then Hans wins the election. Which can actually be quite different from voting for only one of the favoured candidates.
Here is a comparison of the two methods:
Your "least resistance" example looks like RCV, but your "majority voting" example is NOT RCV.
I guess you must read my article to understand systemic consensus. Here is another one where I explain it:
https://steemit.com/politics/@erh.germany/take-part-in-an-experiment-systemic-consensus-how-can-people-better-participate-in-democratic-processes
It's certainly not RCV. In the RCV method it's all about preferences, I copied the text from the link you gave me: