When Elena met Isolde, aka the antimatter CERN tour on the back of a puma

in #steemstem7 years ago

Earlier this week, I have read an interesting report from the antimatter experiments ongoing at CERN. Just to stress it out, CERN is not only about the Large Hadron Collider, as tens of other experiments are also carried on.


[image credits: Pixabay]

Whilst a month ago, we had the first steemSTEM meetup at CERN (including a short visit of a fraction of the installations), it is now the turn of antimatter to have fun and being taken from point A to point B inside the CERN area.

In our case, both our points A and B have nice names: A is called Elena and B is called Isolde.

This post is naturally about the love story between these two.

In addition, there is a funny fact: this love story involves a puma.


ANTIMATTER IN A NUTSHELL

But first, let us quickly discuss antimatter and what it is exactly.

As already stated many times in many posts, all matter in our universe can be structured from a very small number of basic constituents, the elementary particles of the Standard Model. These elementary bricks include in particular the electrons, as well as quarks that are the building blocks of the protons and the neutrons.


[image credits: Wikipedia]

And as well known, protons, neutrons and electrons form atoms.

This is where our story starts today: atoms, one of them being illustrated on the right.

One can notice, in the picture, that atoms are made of a core, the atomic nucleus.

The latter is itself made of protons (the red blobs) and neutrons (the blue blobs). Finally, a bunch of electrons orbit around the nucleus.

However, a predictions of the theoretical formalism governing the microscopic world is that one can associate with each particle a corresponding antiparticle. This is antimatter.

Protons are hence matched with antiproton partners, neutrons with antineutrons, and electrons with positrons. But this works too at the atomic level: the antimatter counterpart of a hydrogen atom is then an anti-hydrogen atoms.

There are not many differences between a particle and an antiparticle. In fact, a particle and an antiparticle are identical up to their quantum numbers (for instance their electric charge is one of these) that are opposite. And just to name it, this stems from the CPT symmetry, one of the most fundamental symmetries of nature.

What I have just written above is the motivation for producing and studying antimatter: we need to assess the validity of the CPT symmetry and test it as much as possible. And those tests demand the production of antimatter particles.


STORING ANTIMATTER THANKS TO ELENA

The problem with antimatter concerns its storage. As well known, matter and antimatter form an explosive couple. As soon as they meet, they annihilate with each other.

Therefore, in order to study antimatter, it has to be kept away from any single particle of matter. This may sound complicated, as our universe is dominated by matter. On Earth, matter is indeed everywhere.



[image credits: the ELENA experiment ]

But physicists managed to find a solution: the Elena decelerator. Elena is our A character in the love story I describe in this post.

To go back to the topic, first, fresh antiprotons must be created.

This is achieved by firing a proton beam on a metallic target. From this, plenty of particles are produced, including our antiprotons.

Those antiprotons are then finally collected and organized under the form of a beam that is injected into Elena.

The role of Elena is then to slow these antiprotons down to very small speeds, so that they could be easily trapped in order to be provided to the antimatter experiments. For instance, with slowly-moving antiprotons, it becomes kind of easy to produce anti-hydrogen.


ANTIPROTONS ON A PUMA BROUGHT TO ISOLDE

Recently, a new project called PUMA was proposed. Now we have the link with the pumas.

PUMA is an acronym that stands for antiProton Unstable Matter Annihilation. As can be guessed from this name (can you?), the PUMA project aims to study what is going on when antiprotons interact with special atomic nuclei.

The idea is to focus on atomic nuclei featuring a lot of neutrons, and in particular a halo of neutrons around them. Such a halo is usually called a neutron skin. But no one knows the details behind this neutron-skinned atomic nuclei.


[image credits: CERN]

The details can however be unraveled by studying the annihilation of the protons and the neutrons inside these nuclei, and such an annihilation process can be induced by antiprotons.

And now comes our third character in our love story (B): Isolde. Isolde is the place where nuclei featuring a neutron skin are produced.

As shown on the map on the right, Isolde and Elena are however not living close to each other…

The solution is natural: we should produce antiprotons at Elena and embark them into a journey to Isolde. Thanks to a special trap to be loaded on a van, this will be made possible. Antimatter will travel. One billion antiprotons will hence be moved from Elena to Isolde!!!

One small step for man, one giant leap for our understanding of the nature of nuclear matter!


SUMMARY

In this post, I detailed some fresh news from the antimatter projects that are ongoing at CERN.

In order to study the reaction of antimatter with exotic atomic nuclei within an experiment called PUMA, a special antiproton trap has been designed. Such a trap is small enough so that it could be loaded on a van, and one billion antiprotons are hence scheduled to be transported from their source (Elena) to the experimental complex (Isolde).

By the way, a stupid information is hidden in this post. Will you find it? :D


SteemSTEM

SteemSTEM is a community-driven project that now runs on Steemit for more than a year. We seek to build a community of science lovers on Steemit and to promote well written/informative Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) postings in order to make Steemit a place for fascinating STEM content.

More information can be found on the @steemstem blog and on our discord server and in our last project report.

The steemSTEM reboot is coming… Why? See here.

Sort:  

This post got me thinking...Well, firstly it reminded my of my own physics classes in school, but also reminded me of the Dan Brown "Angels & Demons", including the search for the anti matter bomb exploding at the end, but after a helicopter took the anti-matter bomb away from the Vatican and main land, more or less.

Although Dan Brown mixes science in truth in his stories, he also mixes untruths in his stories. I think the untrue element in your article is similar to the one of Dan Brown, the time we can store anti matter. Oops, the time of storing was not in the article but in one of your comments/reactions. Ok, that must by right then.

What about this statement you made: "The details can however be unraveled by studying the annihilation of the protons and the neutrons inside these nuclei, and such an annihilation process can be induced by antiprotons."

Yes, an antiproton may be able to induce an annihilation process of a proton/neutron nuclei, but the neutron will still be there after the annihilation since the antiproton acts only to the proton. But that said, I don't think the 'stupid' information part is hidden in here.

Love your statement "One small step for man, one giant leap for our understanding of the nature of nuclear matter!" This, and the Elena/Isolde as well as PUMA naming shows also scientists have humour! :)

Oops, the time of storing was not in the article but in one of your comments/reactions. Ok, that must by right then.

I recommend to check the results of the BASE experiment. They manage to trap antiprotons during more than a year, without loosing any single antiparticle. But this of course requires a special apparatus, and storing antimatter where it has been produced is a totally different story than transporting it.

See here for more information for the BASE experiment results (tagging @greenrun as he may also be interested by this article).

Yes, an antiproton may be able to induce an annihilation process of a proton/neutron nuclei, but the neutron will still be there after the annihilation since the antiproton acts only to the proton. But that said, I don't think the 'stupid' information part is hidden in here.

Let's say that the antiproton may scatter with the nuclear structure, which may lead to the emission of extra particles, change the nuclear equilibrium, etc... There are plenty of models on the market trying to explain that (I could quote a few names but I am not sure you really want to check them all :p).

One very interesting point is that it is been experimentally observed, already more than 20 years ago, that antiprotons induce a too large neutron production in the nuclei

I hope this clarifies without being too technical at the same time.

Love your statement "One small step for man, one giant leap for our understanding of the nature of nuclear matter!" This, and the Elena/Isolde as well as PUMA naming shows also scientists have humour! :)

One should never underestimate physicists' jokes :D

PS: I am not a big fan of Dan Brown at all. I had to read his book a while ago for a science cafe (mainly aiming to clarify the unclear and inexact points in it).

Thanks for your solid comment, I'll check the given links later today!

Dan Brown: I remember all the conversations I was in when this Da Vinci Code book became a huge success! Most of the people who have read that book, thought everything on the science side was true. Dan Brown achieved two things that are good imho: 1) entertainment for those who like to read but not too much limited by imagination 2) expose the mass to science. The later is important since less and less people decide to study beta type of topics, while the future will be more and more about beta topics with all the technology we are and will be creating to automate the world to such levels we as humans - at some point in time - don't have to work anymore.

Still wondering about the error in your post. When will you inform us?

Yeah, Dan Brown triggered a lot of activities with the public. And for that, we must thank him :)

PS: Which error are you talking about? I don't see any.

stupid information is hidden in this post

Oww sorry, you didn't say 'error' but 'stupid' :)

Yes, there is indeed a stupidity somewhere.

Hint: check the references (and some of the other comments) ;)

Thanks @lemouth, it was an entertaining read. The successful trapping of the antiprotons for so long is really innovative. I watched the movie, The Davinci Code, the book was one I'm yet to get my hands on. @edje, which error are referring to?

I love the "metallic target" link! :)

Those antiprotons are then finally collected and organized under the form of a beam that is injected into Elena.

Typical question from a biologist - how do you collect antiprotons and make them into the beam?

Thanks to a special trap to be loaded on a van, this will be made possible.

What??? :)

I love the "metallic target" link! :)

This is the proof you have carefully read my post :)

Typical question from a biologist - how do you collect antiprotons and make them into the beam?

Always magnets. Antiprotons are charged particles so that with electric and magnetic fields, we can control them.

What??? :)

Yes! :D

To be honest, the minivan part sounded so impossible that for one sec I thought - no way! But Metallica is cool :)

It is possible. Or at least it will be, as all of this is planned.

So does this mean matter and anti-matter respond the same way to magnetic fields? There are no such things as anti-magnetic fields?

The answer is yes and no. They respond in the same way as the laws that are used are the same. However, those laws involve the electric charge that is opposite. Therefore, the effect will be different.

But there is no antimagnetic field. Electromagnetism does not care of the particle/antiparticle nature of the objects.

Thanks for clearing that up! I think it makes sense... though I'm surprised there's no anti-elecromagnetism... the logic in my first-year-uni-physics mind goes as follows (and is probably very incorrect).

  • The flow of electrons is what makes electricity
  • ... and the flow of electricity is what produces magnetic fields
  • .... then the flow of the anti-matter equivelent of an electron (a positron?) should produce an anti-magnetic field....

Though now I break it down like that... perhaps the production of a magnetic field depends only on the movement of a charge, and therfor the flow of a positron in direction a would simple produce the opposite magnetic field as the flow of an electron in direction a... am I close here?

At the end of the comment, you are right.

Maxwell equations (electromagnetism) depend on the charge of the (anti)particle. Therefore, the same equations are used regardless of the matter/antimatter nature of the particle. In some equation, you will have a +e and in other a -e, that's it. Magnetism stays the same (the same laws are used). From the same laws, we will derive the magnetic field (and its direction will be different).

I once read a documentary about Antimatter being the world's costliest material (I think it stood at some few trillion dollars per gram), I wouldn't know if it still maintains that ranking.
Haven't really read much about Antimatter apart from one theoretical proposition I read about powering spaceship with Antimatter. How possible is this?

Nice piece sir

I once read a documentary about Antimatter being the world's costliest material (I think it stood at some few trillion dollars per gram), I wouldn't know if it still maintains that ranking.

This is correct and wrong at the same time. Positrons are antimatter particles and can be produced very easily. However, if by antimatter, one refers to antihydrogen, then the costs are huge.

Haven't really read much about Antimatter apart from one theoretical proposition I read about powering spaceship with Antimatter. How possible is this?

This relies on positrons. However, I don't know the exact status. Just that there is a bunch of researches about that and we are very far from any concrete working example (at least to my knowledge).

Thanks a lot for the quick lectures sir.
Well, the beauty of learning is in "learning, un-learning, and re-learning"

Un-learning? naaah... See this more like an update. This sounds more positive ;)

You're absolutely correct sir.. It's actually an update :)

The acronyms makes it pretty more interesting subject to read. May all the secrets of the neutron skin be unravelled. Is there any danger associated with the scheduled transport? I heard a teaspoon of antimatter is enough to destroy a city.

No, thanks to the trap. The antiprotons will stay trapped and have no way to escape. We have today some technology allowing us to trap them for years (you can check the results of the BASE experiment),

That fact is certainly reassuring. I'd check the BASE experiment.

I've heard teaspoon is worth billions. Should be more worried about robbers on the way.
How secure is that place anyway?

It is secured. Don't worry. It worth million to produce, but it is also hard to store. Robbers may have issues with the storage... and explode themselves :D

That looks like a safety check :)

How big would be the explosion?

I have no idea. I don't have the "detailed details" of what they are planning to do. But I can imagine devastating :D

You say..
"Therefore, in order to study antimatter, it has to be kept away from any single particle of matter. "
then..
"The role of Elena is then to slow these antiprotons down to very small speeds, so that they could be easily trapped in order to be provided to the antimatter experiments. For instance, with slowly-moving antiprotons, it becomes kind of easy to produce anti-hydrogen."

Yeah, but I still don't understand how this stops them from reacting with matter and go kaboom? The link to metallica doesn't really help :P

In fact, magnetic fields are helping. We are dealing with a magnetic trap preventing particles and antiparticles to meet.

Vey heavy heavy metal as you can see ;)

Aha! Now it makes sense. Although I wouldnt call metallica heavy metal. More like country music XD

Or classical music. This helps my son to fall asleep ;)

@lemouth, I believe the production of anti-proton and other anti-particles has validated CPT symmetry.

Now I will like you to clarify these statements for me:

As well known, matter and antimatter form an explosive couple. As soon as they meet, they annihilate with each other.

The details can however be unraveled by studying the annihilation of the protons and the neutrons inside these nuclei, and such an annihilation process can be induced by antiprotons.

Now my question is this: The first statement affirmed that annihilation occurs when antimatter is couple with matter. The second statement on the other hand, is talking about the annihilation of proton and neutron in the neutron skinned nucleus. Is that not contrasting? Because my interpretation of the second statement is that the proton (matter) and neutron (another matter) will annihilate. Whereas it should be anti matter versus matter.

Please clear me on this. Thanks!

@lemouth, I believe the production of anti-proton and other anti-particles has validated CPT symmetry.

Not is has not. The validation of the CPT symmetry include many extra tests that are still on-going.

Now my question is this: The first statement affirmed that annihilation occurs when antimatter is couple with matter. The second statement on the other hand, is talking about the annihilation of proton and neutron in the neutron skinned nucleus. Is that not contrasting? Because my interpretation of the second statement is that the proton (matter) and neutron (another matter) will annihilate. Whereas it should be anti matter versus matter.

Let's take a particle A and the associated antiparticle Abar. WHen A meets Abar, they annihilate. Here, the story is different. When the antiproton approaches the exotic nuclei, the first thing it will do is to modify the nuclear dynamics. Moreover, the nucleus is surrounded by neutrons and not protons (instead of having A and Abar, we are having A and Bbar that does not annihilate). There are several models on the market that describe how the nuclear dynamics change, and this new dynamics will induce proton-neutron annihilation. In order to know better the correct modeling of all of this, we will soon have PUMA :)

Is it clearer?

Thanks for the explanation. It is all clear now. The point which made it clear is this:

When the antiproton approaches the exotic nuclei, the first thing it will do is to modify the nuclear dynamics

And concerning the CPT symmetry, I hope we are able to validate it. Also, can you tell me some of the other tests that are needed?

we need to check all the properties of matter and those of antimatter and check their match, and do that on various species of particles. we are far from there, as antimatter is not that easy to produce :)

I'm wondering if you first came with the cool name PUMA and tried to unfold it, or it was the other way around...

I guess you tried to build a TIGER: Tritium Induced Gamma E... Enhanced Radiation. Hey, could we build "Tritium Induced Gamma Enhanced Radiation". Makes no sense? Back to the drawing board.

I think so ;)

You should ask the PI of the PUMA experiment. But I guess the name came after :D

I do not really understand about this, because my physics is very bad. Recently I tried to study it again. For the content of this paper I can not fully control what is meant by antimatter. Then I tried to ask one of my friends, and he explained that: "Antimatter or antimatter, is a material consisting of antiparticles of particles that make up an ordinary matter, if an identical particle and antiparticle touch each other, mutually destructive, meaning that both are converted into other particles of equal energy according to Albert Einstein's equation, E = mc². Antimatter is not found naturally on Earth, except for only a very short time and in very little amount due to radioactive decay or cosmic rays."

Do you agree with what my friends are saying?

Thanks @lemouth....

This sentence looks pretty confusing to me. Let me try to decipher it piece by piece. When a given particle meets the associated antiparticle, they indeed annihilates. With the available energy, this could lead to the creation of other particles.

Antimatter is not very common in our universe, because for some unknown reasons that physicists are trying to get, there was slightly more matter than antimatter in the early days. Therefore, after possible pairs annihilate, only some matter was left.

Antimatter therefore needs to be produced. This could work in particle accelerators, cosmic rays, etc... using the opposite process as mentioned above. With some energy, we can create some particle-antiparticle pairs.

Does it clarify?

Sorry for my ugly writing.

Yesterday I just read an article about this. After getting an explanation from you I already understand a little about this. I will learn more about this in physics books in the library.

thank you for your response @lemouth

Thanks, I just made a post about About Tachyon Particles. I hope you can take the time to read and respond to what the dullness of my writing is. I just need correction, do not expect more. Hopefully you can consider this.

Thanks @lemouth

I will give it a look later today :)

Very good the way you explain giving a particular name as Elena and Isolde, Antimatter is indistinguishable from the normal matter, of which we are made, the only difference is in its opposite electrical charge. If a particle and an antiparticle rubbed against each other, they would annul each other, thus causing their annihilation. But, in addition, the antimatter is full of secrets about the beginning of the Universe, that little by little with the work in the CERN they finished giving the answer of the true origin of your Universe ... And the stupid part of your post still I could not figure it out I'll read it again to see what I can deduce

Thanks for your comment.

Elena and Isolde are real names. This is how the experimental platforms are called in reality.

Antimatter is indistinguishable from the normal matter, of which we are made, the only difference is in its opposite electrical charge

Antimatter is similar to matter, but it can be distinguished. Different properties means different handles for observing something and get what it is.

The rest of your comment is correct.

And the stupid part of your post still I could not figure it out I'll read it again to see what I can deduce

Ahaha! Good luck. I won't give you the answer :D

This is the first I have heard of the CPT symmetry. Really exciting to hear that we are making progress at understanding our universe on a very basic level.

The CPT symmetry idea is very old. It has appeared in the 1960s. However, its tests are still on-going (it passes all tests so far).

Hahahaha, new, old, is all relative. I would say 50 years ago is indeed pretty old compared to our own timeline of being on planet earth in living condition. However, in terms of science 50 year ago is pretty new to me :)

Yes, you are totally right. Knowing that particle physics is a very young field, 50 years can be considered as old, no? :D

Hahahaha, yep , all relative! :)

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.21
TRX 0.25
JST 0.038
BTC 97111.20
ETH 3382.29
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.20