You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Fighting plagiarism and intellectual dishonesty with proper citations

in #steemstem7 years ago

Something interesting to ponder is the content presented in the recent post by @justtryme90 about the actual audience reached by science blogs versus the intended audience. I mean yes I do completely agree that good referencing is, to some extent, required (and proper referencing makes a blog go from being like a 6 in sexiness to a 9 so fast, if that makes sense)

Sort:  

Thanks. I will check that post out :o)

I don't think that you will really notice much of referencing if it is done properly. Whenever a fact is presented you just put a number in square brackets. I am not sure if that harms the sexiness of a post.

What I think is most harmful for sexiness is when you present all the details behind a result. But for most fields you can write a result driven sexy post without details.

No the numbers in square brackets don't take away from sexiness, what does though is when someone has a link that goes nowhere and so it would just reload the page if clicked. Just my opinion though on that one!

Yeah. I agree :o)

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.15
JST 0.028
BTC 62227.11
ETH 2400.78
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.50