You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Not sure why titles are mandatory tbh
I don't think the concept of rules applies in this situation. The idea carries a lot of assumptions with it that simply don't make sense in this type of society. It's like asking what the radius of a square is imo
So how do people know what is allowed and what is not allowed?
you have the ability to do whatever you want with the tools you have. The question is what the impact will be and if others will try to stop you. There isn't some god telling you what is and is not allowed, it completely depends on the situation.
Are you asking how people would react to your actions? If they would structure it in a specific way?
If someone kills another person, how do you resolve the conflict that could arise from there? If someone sexually abuses another person, say a child, how does society proceed in that case?
there is no set way to proceed.
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/peter-gelderloos-anarchy-works
That book goes over cases in history where systems like this were in place.
What I would do is tie the person up, call a town meeting, and decide what to do from there. Maybe I won't have enough time, and my only solution will be to shoot them. It all comes down to the individual decisions of those involved. Some might not call a local council, some may create a specific force dedicated to this. Who knows
mmmm I see ... but if there are no rules, why would a meeting be called or why would someone who would kill or abuse someone else be punished in any way? Is there a principle or something?
how about you read that book, it goes into detail on any situation you could throw at me here with actual historical examples
a meeting would be called because we want to call a meeting. It's that simple. It turns out people are perfectly capable of doing things when there isn't a gun pointed at their head