You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steemit Betting Scandal - Crowdfund to pay @Walden our internet detective.
I can't reply to other other comment - already nested too deep.
That's what I'm talking about - it seems you've already labeled this as an injustice, and I think that's where a lot of the misconception and criticism is coming from. This is where my comment about reserving judgement comes in.
You have to remember that I know a lot more about what went on than the third parties commenting. I'm certain of some things, fairly sure about a lot of things and have suspicions about a few more.
With the information I have this is a valid position for me to hold. Saying I should disregard what I've found out is to ask me to throw occams razor out of the window.
Sadly I see the future of Steemit as going more towards this passivity. There seems to be great merit attached to 'not making a judgement'.
If we don't struggle to make accurate judgements and act on them, Steemit will degrade into clickbait and scams.
People think they're getting enlightened anarchism and what they're really getting is chaos.