You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Is it a Good Practice to Edit Steem Proposal Posts or Create Update Posts?

To my mind, there have to be Updates rather than updating the original post. This seems much more clean, it will get better noticed by the people who follow the proposal, and is how existing platforms like Kickstarter do it (see the tabs on a random project: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/lomography/petzval-80-slr-art-lens?ref=section-homepage-featured-project ).

Having individual Updates also creates better accountability, from my perspective. After a proposal has been funded, anyone can go and see what updates the proposal creator has made. And if there is a future proposal from the same creator, people can go to their past proposals and more quickly see what updates and when were given by the creator.

(Btw, I think this would be a good post for the SteemDevs community. Or maybe a separate dedicated community for proposals as not all are dev-related.)

Sort:  

To my mind, there have to be Updates rather than updating the original post. [...]

I'm also leaning towards that, with one, or possibly two additions:

  1. I would update the original proposal post to link the additional updates, to be easier to find (or manage this through the interface like Kickstarter)
  2. (optionally, for "extra points") I would link each newly proposed feature / improvement of an existing one from the original proposal post to the update post(s) where its progress is discussed.

I think this would be a good post for the SteemDevs community

I haven't thought of that. Initially I wanted to add this in SteemHelp community, but eventually I just added it on my blog.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.15
TRX 0.25
JST 0.038
BTC 96862.96
ETH 1848.21
USDT 1.00
SBD 0.86