What is the SEG Mock-Up ?

What is a “Mockup”?
And what does the SEG Mockup demonstrate?

SEG stands for Searl Effect Generator. But in this article, we are discussing the functionality of the design using a Mock Up Homopolar Motor.

First, we must look at John Searl's claims.
Then isolate each claim, build it out, and demonstrate it.
There are many concepts the SEG Mock Up displays.

Let’s look at it from an electrical engineering point of view.

The point of the different mockups is to isolate factors of John Searl's claims and show the individual parts in working examples.
We have a few different mockups/ proof-of-concept to isolate specific functions.

The first is a homopolar demonstration unit plugged into a power supply. (which is plugged into the wall socket.) It spins about 8 lbs of weight in an orbit at 200 RPM at 5 volts/ 2 amps. (10 watts).
The orbiting rollers also freely spin on their centripetal axis.

The factors isolated in the demonstration units are:

• To show 3 vectors of forces. Magnetic (axial), Motion (Orbital), and Electric (Radial).
• To show the motorability of the design. (how smoothly it moves)
• To show the rollers spin together as one, stay on track and remain equidistant. (while not attached to any crank shafts, armatures, belts, commutators, etc.)
• To show the eddy current repulsion after a certain RPM which makes for the roller to hover AND spin.
• To show simultaneous attraction and repulsion between roller and stator, resulting in frictionless magnetic bearings.
• To show unique waveforms imprinted on the magnet rings.
• To show the reason why the rollers spin without touching the surface is because of the waveforms.
• To show why the rollers move in an orbit is because a radial electric current is present.
• To show that, indeed, unique waveforms exist in magnetization and can be duplicated repeatedly.
• To show the homopolar/unipolar quality of the design with no need to alternate poles to maintain 360˚ rotation. (homopolar refers to the electric field. Not some magnetic “monopole”)

Claim #1: The SEG is a valid Motor/Generator Design.
What do you need in a viable motor/generator?
You need relative motion. That means 1 part needs to be stationary (stator) and another part must move around (rotor/ magnetic rollers)

There are things called "vectors". 3 of them in this case.
Magnetic, Electric and Motion.
All the vectors occur at 90 degrees to one another. (3 finger rule)
Lorentz Force and Fleming Rule.

All 3 vectors are 90˚ to each other. So, if the magnetic is up and down, and the electric is in a ring outward… therefore, the motion MUST be an orbit around the circumference of the stator.

What does that mean?
That means, as a radial (ring shaped) electric current flows through the stator, the magnetic rollers MUST move 90 degrees to the side and orbit around. And indeed, they do orbit around the circumference.
That function is inherent in the SEG design.
Claim #1 True. Observed and demonstrated.
The SEG is indeed a valid motor/generator design, satisfying the 3 necessary vectors.

Claim #2: John says the rollers will spin as they orbit the stator. And trace "petals".
As we can see in the first mockup demo, that is also true. The rollers spin on their axis as they orbit the stator. Tracing epicycles. (cardioids)

In the past, John was told “the rollers must spin the opposite direction to the direction they travel.” Or that “every other roller would spin CW, CCW.” But simple observation clearly demonstrates that is not the case.

Claim #2 true. It is self-evident the rollers indeed spin together as they orbit and in the same direction as travel.

Claim #3: But John Searl says the rollers will make no sound, won't touch the surface and “will fly as they spin around the stator.”

It’s obvious the rollers will spin as they orbit the stator as seen in the previous gifs because they are touching the surface of the stator. But, how could the rollers spin around if they are pushed away from the surface? (hovering from eddy currents)
To demonstrate this, it required building an entirely different set-up. (Which took thousands of dollars in itself and a couple months of work.)

Normally, the stator (big ring) is kept still, and the rollers move around it. But, to isolate the frictionless bearing effect, we inversed the roles of the stator and roller.
Rather than have the stator positioned horizontal and stationary as seen here:

We flipped the stator’s orientation 90 degrees vertically. This time, we spin the large ring while keeping the small roller in place. It is the same relative motion between roller and stator.

With just a spinning copper ring, we can see the roller lifted-up by the eddy currents. The roller is prevented from touching the surface of the plate (stator) just as John said. (and without need for liquid nitrogen, Meissner Effect / Flux Pinning)

Claim #3 True. That after sufficient RPM, the magnets won't touch, won't vibrate, no friction, no sound, etc.
That makes for a device with moving parts that don’t touch. A machine with no wear doesn’t need maintenance like a conventional motor or generator using oil, bearings, shafts, belts, chains, cranks, commutators, slip rings, mechanical switches, pistons, brushes, etc.

Claim #4: John says the rollers will spin AND levitate.
Normally you can get a magnet to spin OR levitate.
Take a Diametrical Magnet or Axial Magnet and put it next to a spinning mass of copper. You will feel a repulsion preventing the poles of the magnet from touching the copper.

Magnets under the left half of the assembly demonstrate the simultaneous attraction/ repulsion effect. Making for an equilibrium of forces between magnet and eddy currents. Locked in an orbit. Creating a gap between roller and stator.

A Bloch Wall separates North from South on a magnet. It’s the "dividing line" at the equator of all magnets. It is normally a “flat line/ 2D plane”. It is where the magnetism diminishes to zero strength in relation to the tips of the poles.

The shape of a Bloch wall is like the common wall shared between 2 soap bubbles.

A flat line on the Bloch Wall = Magnet hovering but no spin. Or 90˚, Spin with friction but no hover. So, by simulating a wave with the Bloch Wall, it makes the cylinder levitate And spin.

This wave traces the path like a carousel around the circumference. In motion, it looks like a serpent’s tail wiggling. Repeating the wave.

The waveform is the reason WHY the rollers spin And levitate in the presence of eddy currents.

Similar principle described by Eric Laithwaite in his old presentation called The Magnetic River.

Claim #4 True. Indeed, the axial rollers will spin And levitate as they orbit the stator.
(But only with an added/ simulated wave)

Claim #5: The rollers remain equidistant, self-align and stay on track, while not attached to any crank shafts, armatures, belts, or commutators. This claim is self-evident. Observed and demonstrated. The rollers self-organize from the magnetic repulsion interactions, stay level around the stator, etc.

Claim #6: There is a current flowing through the gap where the rollers are situated; and, that force is the reason Why the rollers move to the side. That there is indeed a current flowing which is toroidal in shape. Simulated by the wires positioned from the periphery to the top. Showing the currents flow in a loop out the system at the equator and back in at the poles.

Claim #6 is True similar to Claim #1, but we built that other unit to demonstrate the principle of spin motion without the presence of rollers.

Claim #7 : Magnetic waves can be imprinted onto ferrous materials. Fernando Morris built other units to isolate this claim.
He also built his own magnetizer from scratch powered with about a dozen car batteries in series. Over 1000 amps @ about 70 volts. Yikes! O_o

But now... we have a bit more capabilities in a professional environment.
(of which we built ourselves through years of hard work!)

Fernando repeatedly demonstrates that indeed waveforms/ frequencies/ variations can be imprinted into magnetic materials. The materials "remember" the glitches. The magnets are made in a uniform fashion which Should result in a uniform field... but the field is Not uniform. There is not much literature to explain why this happens. It shouldn't happen, but it does. And we can plainly see the results on the scopes. Fernando built a test platform as seen here:

Looking closer to the right of the ring on the platform, we can see 2 compasses on either side wavering:

The magnetic ring is made to turn. Like how your car tires are made to turn during a smog check. There are 2 compasses on either side of the uniquely magnetized axial ring. There is a analog gauss meter probe on the ring connected to a digital oscilloscope. The scope reads out the waveform on the ring as it turns. A normal Bloch Wall reaps a flat line.
The compasses on either side of the ring fluctuate as it spins showing a variation in waveform and polarities as seen above. There is a superimposed field in addition to the axial magnetization.
(This is the only project known to ever demonstrate this effect)

That right there is VERY different from other magnets. You can also tell something strange with the imprinted magnets because they hop forward on a ferrous surface as you push it. Verses regular magnets with a "flat Bloch Wall".

All known magnets are made the same way with the same high capacitive discharge and no consideration of wavelengths or frequency. They just hammer the metal with a current to saturate it resulting in "a magnet." It's all the industry knows and practices.

Take note that we are way beyond coincidence now from an electrical engineering point of view. There is already enough reasonable validation to move forward in engineering a full-scale prototype. However, putting all the factors together in 1 manufacturer’s prototype is even more complex and requires a different level of funding.

Magnetic Wave Polarity Flip Context - SEG MockUp

Consider this Blog as Lesson #1 on the SEG validations using the Mockup demonstration units.
.
Here is another article about the concept of combining Cymatics with Magnetization and Coded Magnets:
https://steemit.com/steemit/@verbz/coded-magnets-multipole-vs-magnetic-waveforms

There are many other aspects about the SEG that need to be understood.
It is pure mathematics, geometry and electrical engineering in 3D Euclidean Space.

This educational material is freely being spread in hopes to educate people to the reality and viability of this "field" of electrical engineering. Exciting potential for this breakthrough in magnetic waveform technology. To combine known aspects of physics and electrical engineering to apply them in new ways!

For purpose of powering our homes and industry, recharging car batteries without need to plug in, and much more. Even the potential to remediate nuclear waste, purify the air and eradicate harmful bacteria and viruses with negative ions.
While simultaneously creating financial freedom and energy independence through a new and more efficient method.
Can even be used to power cryptocurrency mining operations.
(Abiding by the laws of thermodynamics)

The scientific community truly need to understand the significance of this discovery.
Studying the imprinting of magnetic waveforms for energy generation should be getting government-level funding.
Or support equal to SpaceX, NASA or CERN.
.

.
Please visit our corporate website:
https://segmagnetics.com

Thank You for the interest and support.
--Jason Verbelli
SEG Magnetics, Inc.