That's a tough thing to figure out. I've determined (unscientifically) that posts really shouldn't take longer than five minutes to read. It's hard to keep someone's attention longer than that in this format. I've tried to break up the content with pretty pictures to help people along, but I still don't want to overwhelm them.
In the story I've been writing about @themanwithnoname (aka, real story of my life. I'm really, really old) I have split it up into multiple posts. Originally parts 2 and 3 were one post, but it got too long, so I broke it up into two posts. Now I tend to hit my approximate target of 800-1,000 words. I don't think there's anything wrong with breaking it up... even if it won't be that way in the book.
I hadn't realized that the pricing of SBD was "never go below $1." I heard that when it was below $1, that people would get paid interest on the SBD they controlled. My understanding was that the creators wanted SBD to be pegged to $1 so that it could be a stable token which would encourage more usage. If someone knows their token will be worth the same tomorrow as in 4 weeks, they're more likely to accept it as payment. Otherwise, you get what you have now... a redundant second token that's boosting payouts. (I'm not complaining about the extra payout, I'm just saying it doesn't make sense.)
Yes, there was the interest payment that was supposed to act like a bond.
I think there might be a few competing narratives right now and nobody really knows how to proceed. OR, I may just be supremely ignorant on this one. :-)