You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Extensive curation stats overview since HF19 (June 20th 2017)
this hard fork was very bad for me
Completely and utterly wrong.
How much do you think you would have made as a new user under the pre-HF rules? My guess is approximately zero, since you weren't a well-known trending "star" with whale support. You've made more than that on this one comment alone.
I made this from this comment because I am upvoted by @jamesbrown ( thanks James by the way ), he has 43,368 steem power, but if you look at my old post you see that I earned few cents from post, just lately I began to giveaway my money this why it's few dollars but before.... Just check my page !
My account had approximately that much SP before the HF, before the experiment. I would give out $0.01 or $0.02 on a 100% vote. Granted, the price has gone up significantly since then, but my guess is jamesbrown's vote would be worth $0.20 or so instead of $7. This hard fork has been very beneficial for you and almost everyone. Save for the top 0.1% authors and whales.
if jamesbrown's vote would be worth $0.20 , why my comment worthed more than $7 when it was upvoted just by my ( my vote worth 0.02 ) and him ?
Because of this hard fork. It would have been nowhere near $7 with the old hard fork algorithm.