Curator Author Split Should Be 50 / 50 !

in #steemit8 years ago

BENEFITS

  • Increased Engagement - if people make more money curating, they will curate more
  • Increased Spreading of the Love - if people curate more, more posts get upvoted, and more upvotes means more money ...
  • Will Slow the Blood-Letting - Phat sobs who are getting too much from posts are cashing that shit faster than you can say "Outta Here!" .. if they made less from posts, and more from curation, they would power up and do more of EVERYTHING, except taking their money off the table to buy pizza for the girlfriend's unemployed brother.

DOWNSIDE?

NONE!

Sort:  

Yeah, and the unemployed brother in law needs to get busy curating as well...

Good post..

no, 75% is good enough as it is.
50/50 is just giving more power to the ones with mass steem power.
:/

Think about all those many hundred dollar posts, that half of the earnings will go to the 'many' upvoters ... I think there is a case to be made that the abuse would be lessened, not worsened. Besides, our concerns should lie mostly with the bored and totally fucking broke minnows, who earn nothing from posting, and very very little from curation!!

If 50% of @dollarvigilante's income went to the curators, I wouldn't hate that sob so much. :-)

I would prefer to get the money from my own posts then trying to ride the coat tails of someone else.

It's not about the money .. people are so short-sighted. It is about making people's time worth something ... it's about getting people involved and excited, it's about incentivizing support for the economy .. and making it less worthwhile to take the money and run.

Does no one see that? You people behave like a bunch of frightened children whenever someone proposes anything! :)

i don't know who your referring to as you people but i am not part of any group and do not like the idea of others actions and words coming back to me.

I'm only saying i don't care about trying to make money off of other peoples posts, i would rather make money off my own post and the idea that people get any of the money generated from work i have done (the post) and not under their own work is annoying and imo is just another thing pushing people away.
Has nothing to do with being frightened or anything like that.
Maybe fix the huge problem with the flagging system before we try to give others money they did not work for?

cheese = cheese ; holes in cheese = no cheese

the more cheese you have the more holes you have
-> more cheese = less cheese

Are you saying there's no such thing as a cheese lunch?

Well, this isn't about distribution friend, it's about .. UPING THE FUN! :-)

????
Curators will be clicking like mad!!!
How easy to curate than doing a posting.
Cough cough 😜

Look at your curation rewards .. with a 50/50 split they would only be 20% higher, and the voting power limitations would still apply. NO .. the fear-mongering is all bullshit! There would only be slightly more incentive to be active, and slightly less incentive to withdraw.

THIS IS A VERY GOOD IDEA !! DAMMMMIT! :-)

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.18
JST 0.036
BTC 90080.39
ETH 3207.90
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.75