You seem somewhat aggressive boss and/or snarky. I agree @pradeeprajora technically violated no rule and used the sites permissible features in a way he felt benefited him. That said just as are some of grumpycats practices likely to be viewed as abusive, users with the power have flagged him. I likewise used permissible site features to downvote what I viewed as an over rewarded post. Actually the first line of permissible reasons to flag "rewards disputes". I looked at it objectively, a weighed the quality of the content and I made the decision that it was unworthy of the payout it was receiving based upon the fact that it was a stolen FB image and non original work. I then went more objective and perused his entire blog and noticed a pattern of him purchasing votes at the last minute to over reward stolen content and/or meaningless content directly before it paid. I don't have the horsepower to do anything to grumpy nor can I place myself in a position to relate to having that high of a stake in the site. As a professional trader, however, I would likely of done the same thing in regards to going to Bittex during that time to sell of prior to consolidation/correction in price so as I could purchase more at a discount. That is just me.. I also doubt that a person of that level of wealth needs to withdraw from here to bank their capital as they more than likely have a wide range of crypto assets and he would of never gotten to that level through placing all of his eggs in one basket. Maybe he is playing to market, maybe he is a greedy pig, maybe he is powering down to repower up at a higher percentage.. I don't know.. regardless the site needs to change to prevent vote selling and/or the heart of this article.