You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The Blockchain Just Became 😨 Obsolete 😨, the Future is Hashgraph... or NOT?! 😎
Going from Leemon Baird, everyone get's the whole state eventually and since the messages are so small it could work for just currency. Bigger apps might be problematic but you don't have to save the whole state.
And they have Java apps for you to play with @alexpmorris also a little stock exchange thingie ;)
this is kind of interesting too, @nutela. I went to check out the Swirlds/Hashgraph SDK, and saw this message:
And from this post, "Is Hashgraph Technology Just Hype, or Can It Dethrone Blockchain?":
So at this point all that is available for Swirlds is a closed-source library, and I've gotta contact their sales department if I want to deploy my application?! Not to mention, of course, that Swirlds even has multiple patents on the future of the "free and open" blockchain killer, which of course is their private solution, wait for it... Hashgraph!
Hmmmm......... yeah, unless I'm reeeeeeaaaaalllly missing something here, I think I'll pass.
As I've written in other comments, I'm not saying there aren't particular use-cases where Hashgraph may be useful, such as for the purpose of a temporal distributed order book. But the thing is, perhaps you can explain to me (except for possibly a more stream-lined "plug-and-play" solution), how this is so revolutionary versus something like Bisq Network (also open-source and written in Java):
Link: Bisq Network FAQ
In addition, by using TOR, counterparties have a lot more anonymity than I would expect they would through a Swirlds-based solution, but feel free to correct me if I'm wrong on this.
Also, perhaps you can also better explain to me this whole concept of "gossip about gossip", because the more I try to understand it, the more it seems to me little more than a fancy marketing "buzzword".
Bisq sounds mighty interesting, I'll check coinmarketcap.
Gossip about gossip means that everyone adds two hashes from which the order can be validated.
ah okay, "the order", and what about "the validity"?
It's valid when it is in order, double spending cannot occur because of the order of the tokens! You cannot suddenly have a coin or spend it twice, the first one is always valid...
But it could happen that tx1 spends all the funds, which would make tx2 invalid. When you receive the votes and reorder, and realize tx2 is invalid, what do you do ? Broadcast a reorg?!