You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Eleven steem-data analysts to follow if you want a deeper* understanding of steemit
Upvoted on behalf of the dropahead Curation Team!
DISCLAIMER: dropahead Curation Team does not necessarily share opinions expressed in this article, but find author's effort and/or contribution deserves better reward and visibility.
Help us giving you bigger upvotes by:
|
|
|---|---|
to maximize your curation rewards! |
|
with SteemConnect |
12.5SP, 25SP, 50SP, 100SP, 250SP, 500SP, 1000SP |
Do the above and we'll have more STEEM POWER to give YOU bigger rewards next time!
News from dropahead: How to give back to the dropahead Project in 15 seconds or less
Quality review by the dropahead Curation Team
According to our quality standards(1), your publication has reached an score of 75%.
There are many details that can be improved. Baby steps!
(1) dropahead Witness' quality standards:
- Graphic relation to the text (Choice of images according to the text)
- Order and coherence
- Style and uniqueness (Personal touch, logic, complexity, what makes it interesting and easy to understand for the reader)
- Images source and their usage license
Hi - thanks for upvote, but can you tell me where the 'quality standards' are published and how the score is calculated?! It's very useful to get feedback, but I don't get what '75%' means?!