RE: Suggestion: Creating a New Curation System to Incentivise Upvoting Minnows and Creating Long Lasting Content (Part 1)
Some really good ideas here, but I think you'd be able to get more attention, and perhaps people "on board" with your idea(s) if you broke them down.
It looks like you have a grand vision, and have put a lot of thought into how to make Steem/Steemit better - I'm starting to have these thoughts too. But concentrating on a single aspect is likely to get more attention, as it's not as much to take in at once.
For me, the idea which captured my attention was the proportional voting power, incentivising those with higher SP/rep to vote for those with lower SP/rep. This would hugely incentivise newer visitors to the platform, helping Steem/Steemit grow.
I do think you'll come up against some resistance though, as those with the most power are likely to resist giving it up (but thankfully there are whales who do care enough too).
Once you get traction with one idea, then introduce others.
That's a good point. This whole thing seems long and hard to read and kinda messy. Maybe I'll try repost this but with just the first point! But the problem is, I need to have all 3 main sections of this together for it to really make sense.
Yes I agree, it's good but too long especially the math which I can't really get into... :) I like the summarized points though, all except #7 the 'random thought' of giving more help to certain communities... who decides which community gets it? I see potential for abuse, or at least lots of complaints from people. :)