You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: 📌 Let's Learn from John McAfee: Allow the transfer of Steem Power ownership

in #steemit8 years ago (edited)

Transferring of vests must be done since even its to hard to curate current state to satisfy users. For now, it's just whales game and they do all the curation, we poor ones just do shit at curating. Even distribution of steempower would mean fairer votes and would bring up the quality of platform up. I don't even need it to be transferred I just need stronger steempower up to a point my vote means something. Otherwise, it's useless for me to curate content and for a majority of users. Dilution of steempower through platform would mean health for a platform (and it would need to be short one). As a consequence of that, there would be even more inflation of steem, which would surely drop down the price of steem since no one would need to buy it.
This brings next problem in perspective. New users that would come would again be powerless and there would be new dilution interval and so on.
Best case scenario would be to come to the distribution that equals to gauss function, on the sides are users with most and least with SP currently in the middle are ones that are in the middle now, where they now have the most power to vote and after that have a fresh start.

That power can stay in ownership with the current owner but should be transferred to those that are most productive to shape this space and later returned.
Furthermore, that would mean that those that are making content would again have the most power and not those that vote right, but would certainly help the situation because this is meant to be content creation platform, not just ownership or money platform.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.25
JST 0.038
BTC 97039.40
ETH 3409.06
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.03