I think it is better, although not everything is the best at the moment, but even in nature, crystal forms do not occur often.

I thought: what specific features Steemit could distinguish Steemit, so that the claim of its superiority would be justified? I can give few such a features, as well as many people here. But our preferences are always subjective, so perhaps it would be worth to objectify them a bit.

How to do it? - It's the easiest way: let's have fun, use the commenting tools under the note and set the rules for order:

Each participant gives a maximum of 2 attributes (comments) for which Steemit prefers.

We format the comment of choice, as follows: the name of the feature distinguished by a larger letter. Let's do it by entering: {#} [name] {#} -without these brackets. And underneath, you can add a wider description and possibly further comments. This helps better visibility.

Then we do 'upvote' the preferred features, given in the comments. In this way, any commentator giving an interesting feature will receive points on your wallet.

Simple fun and everybody happy, and for that we have interesting material about our objectified preferences (i hope).

Note that this is a universal method, can be used for various purposes, such as: presidential elections; choices of favorite technical gadgets; choices of some other solutions or methods.
So it's worth trying how it works? Dedicate the amount of time for your choices and there is no loss, there is earnings, it is fun. So why not do it?