You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: There's A Huge Dip In User Activity Since The Attack - Does That Mean The Single Steemit Post Is More Valuable?
Less users doesn't necessarily mean more curation rewards.
For one, each user still has the same voting power, when they can vote.
If you have a higher voting power, then it still requires that more people with less voting power upvote the article after you in order to increase the overall rewards.
The STEEM Rewards Pool is filling up, even if people can't get to the site.
It is easy to test this by voting on your own article and determining whether or not you see an increase or decrease over the last 14 days.
Thanks for the elaboration. My voting power is not more than 1cent, so it's probably up to others to see.
I thought that Steem pool gets emptied daily? So even if you have little voting power, it should become more relative to the rest who is on the site..
No, it doesn't go back to 0, it was that it was getting emptied almost as quickly as it was being filled.
Yes, it is all relative to who upvotes in comparison to when you upvote.
can you give me a source where all the voting and payout details are outlined? was always too lazy too look it up.
There isn't one source.
You basically have to keep doing searches until you find a thread that explains it, but it has to be a thread after Hard Fork 19, because things changed a little bit then.
ok thx