You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Growing and Expanding Steemit Through a Developer Fund Proposal
I agree that it is hard to find worthwhile projects compared to other ones, but we could pay at certain points when the goal is met in order to make sure devs are doing work so x amount for phase 1 x amount for phase 2 ect.
What I am pointing to is that if a voting system is used to decide any aspect of this, then those who vote need to be technically skilled and that in itself opens the system up to some degree of corruption in that the skilled voters might be just voting for themselves and their friends. Maybe a payout curve would work, where payouts for development start small and get bigger, the further into a project the developer goes successfully.