So Bitcoin Isn't Real Money According To One Florida Judge! *But My Account Begs to Differ...*
Just when I thought the American Court System was starting to understand Bitcoin, they go and do something like this...
A Judge in Florida recently ruled that Bitcoin wasn't money because it was not backed by any financial institution, was not a tangible good, or in anyway could it be considered a service rendered so it failed to meet the state's standards for a "Real" currency. LOL I love judicial politics sometimes...
In summary this whole thing started as a Money Laundering case over Bitcoin but was thrown out of court because a Florida Judge ruled that Bitcoin did not meet the State Qualifications for being a "Real" currency. Now if only they could convince the IRS of this because they sure as hell want me to report all Bitcoin earnings and profits from exchanges on my annual income tax forms.
The IRS however still missed the mark a bit because they want to treat Bitcoin like a Stock that pays dividends. Legally as of last year I was allowed to account for the cost of all Bitcoins when acquired, and would only be required to pay income tax on the net gains that resulted from the holding or trading of Bitcoins. On the flipside, one was also allowed to write off any losses incurred as a result of bad trades or a decline in the price of one's holdings...
I'm still not sure why, but it's as if these people have never heard of Crypto's even though Bitcoin has been publicized in the mainstream media for years. CNN, Forbes, WSJ, you name a financial publication and I can almost promise you Bitcoin has been mentioned. Even Ethereum has been drawing attention recently, but I guess some people prefer to turn a blind eye towards progress and in this case the good guys won!
Florida judge: Bitcoins aren’t currency, so state money laws don’t apply
Miami man sold via localbitcoins.com, then undercover cop tried to target him.
A Florida judge has decided in favor of a bitcoin vendor charged with violating local money-laundering laws, because, she found, the cryptocurrency is not money as defined under state law.
Published in Arstechnica by CYRUS FARIVAR - 7/27/2016, 6:40 AM
Lol... let them keep thinkin' in that way, it's better for crypto world. Hope I'll get luck and get more "coins".
It's such a cluster**** on parade everytime the Fed's are asked to make a ruling on or deal with Bitcoin. It's not really all that difficult of a technology to understand but for many of these people (many of which have doctorates in other fields) it still seems to remain a magical, mysterious land of, "Mathematical Data, That's Not Money!"
I guess they never bother to look at their bank statements long enough to realize that they're nothing more than a ledger with an account number. Virtually identical to the way a block in a block chain is numbered a bank ledger records transactions in a similar fashion to build an accounting ledger. Both contain a list of indexed transactions which in turn make both a bank ledger and block chain one big giant accounting ledger for all transactions processed. LOL.
Hahaha. Let them think that. More for me.
My sentiments exactly!