You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: 2700 Accounts Love Spam Comments! Is This a Case of Gaming the System or Abuse?
@steemcleaners does handle comment spam whether it is bot or human. This person was actually reported for comment spam. I didn't log it since I'm not sure that spamming only yourself constitutes abuse. You're right about the upvoting for gain, that isn't something @steemcleaners handles.
Some comment spam falls into a grey area. Is the comment spam? That requires us to "moderate" content in some cases which we try to avoid if it isn't abuse outlined in our guide.
Is @ionlysaymeep spam? I like @ionlysaymeep personally and so does some of the community.
I think that the community is going to have to make their own decisions on what they will accept for the most part. Otherwise you ask a group of people to moderate the content of comments.
Yes, @ionlysaymeep is spam, as is the other one just like it that only says "bork". It's tolerable spam, for now, but imagine 15,000 people all thinking that's a good idea and setting up their own spambot. There are 2 of them now, I don't see any reason why anyone wouldn't do it. It's free money.
Well, that's three now that I know of. @iliketoast
Since we don't know them all that tells me that they are keeping their comments relatively in check. I rarely see a meep or toast comment and I don't recall ever seeing bork.
I like toast 🍞
@iliketoast is now the meta of spam commenting.
I like toast 🍞
Might be one of those bots you have to call to the post by mentioning it.
Next level irony from the toastmaster in reply to this comment here.
pretty ballsy move tbh
Perhaps the content of the comments themselves do not have to be necessarily moderated. After all, the platform is designed to showcase content that is upvoted ect.
However, there is no way 2700 people are upvoting @ecoworld for posting numbers.
Clearly, this is abuse. Steem is about benefiting from the community as well as contribution to the community.
@ecoworld has found a way to benefit from the community at the expense of the community
Yeah, other than adding empty transactions to the block chain I don't think one can spam oneself. I don't pretend to understand whether or not there is a problem with "block chain" bloat.
I was told that this topic was brought up in #witness. Maybe someone will take on the task of proposing something that may prevent this in the future. Whether it is the ability to remove SP delegated by @steem or a closer look at the signup process.