We have a process if people disagree with a review. If mod and hunter don’t come to an agreement about a decision, there’s always a step further. We have a discord channel (#mod-errors) in which people can post and then somebody else will look at it. Sometimes this leads to a review being reconsidered and another decision being made about the hunt.

It’s not flexing muscle, everyone reviews multiple hunts every day, for rather low rewards given how long it can take at times to review a hunt (some take 10-15 minutes, follow-on included). Sometimes we make a wrong call and then hunters have multiple options available to dispute the decision made.

One, of course, being “making a point”. If you think points need to be made with the power of SP, that is a mechanic the Steem blockchain approves, and our only weapon we have against massive abuse of the rewards pool. I can not and will not object to that, this is a free world. Luckily enough it is.

Independently of this I have approved your hunt because your hunt is IMHO a valid hunt.