RE: [Steemhunt] SMT and Steemhunts relation
This is a fantastic update. Not only does it contain one of the better explanations of SMTs that I've read, it lays out a great roadmap for SteemHunt that is exciting, ambitious, and clear.
With an update as great as this, smaller issues of style, grammar, and proofreading become a bit more glaring, and as I am here to help, I'm gonna point out a couple of them. These are not meant to take away from the overall quality of the post, but as an encourage to do even better in the future.
- "Steemhunt is a service built on the platform Steem" should be "Steemhunt is a service built on the Steem platform"
- "Based on curations and upvotes from the community content (for Steemhunt it would be hunts) can be rewarded as also the curators can be paid" badly needs a comma after "community." Also "as also the curators can be paid," should maybe be "and also curators can be paid"? It is confusing as it currently is.
- "The following parts are scenarios what could be done based on the launch of SMT with Steemhunt." I think this sentence may be missing the word "of" between "scenarios" and "what."
These all look like the kind of editing errors that crop up when you write and rewrite a text, and are completely understadeable.
It may be useful to get a quick edit from someone else for an announcement as big as this one. Still, the text is clear and readable, and I am very impressed with this update.
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io/.
Chat with us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]
Couldn't resist pointing it out. ;)
Fair. Very fair.
Thanks a lot @didic for your detailed comment and you are right, your suggestions make it much clearer to understand the article. :) I`ve edited the text as suggested.
Thank you for your review, @didic!
So far this week you've reviewed 7 contributions. Keep up the good work!