There are so many interesting facts in this article that just knowing that someone is thinking about them encourages me a bit.

In fact until recently my last perspective was that in Steem the moderations and checks only existed within the communities, as a kind of bubble where what happens outside the communities is ignored.

A large percentage of the users who write outside the communities do it with the purpose of abusing, using the krsuccess tag or any other automatic voting system without supervision.

On the other hand some time ago I reviewed the work of SteemWatchers and it seemed to me that the only thing they did was to mention the abusers and get paid for it without affecting the abusers or the abuse.

I think we need an automatic system similar to @cheetah with the characteristics you have described and a community of developers as utopian was in its time, look at what happens outside the communities because this also affects us all and be responsible with the automatic votes granted by uses of tags or votes of witnesses as these are currently one of the biggest incentives for users without SP abuse and fill the blockchain with junk content.