RE: Let's talk about voting bots
The thing that I can't understand is the number of fairly large investors who must know that their stake is being devalued and really don't seem to care.
I think it's a slumlord problem, eg in a run-down city every individual landlord sees it in their interest to do the bare minimum and simply extract value while waiting for everybody else to revitalize the town into a place that people want to live. The original vision of Steem assumed that "investors" would be incentivized to improve the value of the ecosystem as a whole as a way of improving the value of their stake. But in practice most "investment" has been a combination of speculation and rent-seeking -- why put in more effort, you already did the chain a favor by tying up your wealth in the coin, now it's the chain's turn to do nice things for you.
Yeah, but in this case, I think the investors are the tenants and the bots are the landlords. I don't get why the investors aren't pressuring the bots to get better. i.e. "I want my daily rewards and you should work to increase the value of my stake, too!" Maybe some "activist investors" need to start delegating? 😉