You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Self voting will now NOT be default steemit.com behaviour
I am sitting on some 90% voting power on my @l0k1 account, and I just realised I often evaluate my decision to upvote on the reverse criteria... If it's already making lots, I look for ones that are good and neglected.
Funny enough curators would earn more money that way, but in reality everyone goes for the trending ones and make fractions of the rewards, take away rewards from neglected authors and over-reward trending content in the process.
It's a mess currently :)
It certainly is. I have suggested the idea of increasing the curator share as a positive incentive against self voting, from 25 to 33%, an increase of 75%, by the way.
I just wrote a proposal in my latest article Curation problems (incentive, rewards and self-voting) to increase the incentive for curators and reduce or even eliminate self-voting.
I would even go as far as to distribute 10% to authors and 90% to curators.
That would certainly drive engagement, for sure! I think too far though, would lead to mass random vote spam.
You mean exactly like now? :)
nice, they pushed the change quickly.
No no that, i mean there already is massive vote spam on high earning content :)
that's right! which is why we are trying to stop simple direct self voting.