You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steem Sincerity - Working with SteemPlus to crowdsource spam classification training data
Thanks for the feedback. I'm working on improving classification, I have presented the limitations of the software in my posts about the subject. I agree that the classification for tomole444 is not correct, and I also disagree with the scores received by cuddlekitten.
I think there should be a stronger biasing of the data towards evaluating total number of comments and downvote-ratio.
I'll be curious as to how this progresses, but I do indeed think it should be used with caution as it is, as this becomes available to "end-users" already the labels will be taken as true-beyond-doubt and cuddlekitten has been made aware of her new spammer-label by a few confused cuddle friends already.