You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steem experiment: Burn post #1
One thing I think we need to work on are some tools for creating visibility to issues that require discussion.
We say we are decentralized and yes there is a vote and comment session on important issues, but it sure would help clarify this investment for many if we developed a way to ensure that stake-holders had a chance to weigh in on these issues. In order for this to get visibility for discussion it would need to be voted on, thus compromising your assumed "vote"
Tweeted on Twitter for potential discussion and visibility to prospective investors.
For the record, I laughed at "Rewards too High, and Creating Abuse. Based on WHAT?
Yes that is a great point! So do you imply that it would be helpful to have similar voting to the witness voting, but for relevant community topics and issues?
In addition, I think a better distribution is something we should strive for and with that in mind, I will be flagging as many rewards as I can from this post. (don't worry, not much) With no insult intended at the Author. Waiting until it will not harm visibility, for the sake of fairness and discussion.
No insult perceived nor offense taken. I respect disagreement and am a supporter of downvoting/flagging (though I hate that it is displayed as "flagging" which very much suggests something other than what it actually does) as a means to express it.
Appreciated.