Great work! Amazing that we didn't have this already.
You should include more information on Steem DApps and the fact that they can be programmed with the easy to use and very common JavaScript instead of the more difficult C++ and Solidity required for DApp development on other blockchains. JS developers are much cheaper and more available.
I would encourage everyone to get on wikipedia and undo anti-steem edits by people like Viewmont Viking. We have the numbers to create a great Steem page.
Remember to thanks other people making positive contributions on the Wikipedia page.
Good job! Thanks for taking the time to get this up. I added @steempress to the list of dApps. I think the reference numbers on quite a few of them are off though.
Good idea, a connection to Wordpress might sound important! The reference numbers are not correct in the references list, the references themselves are. Need to look into it later ;)
Power to you!!! I tired to do this back at the end of last year, and got blackballed by the editors of wikipedia who just could not be made to understand that Steem and Steemit were different things! I ended up getting banned for a while because of it. (The mods don't like be questioned...) You can see my previous efforts if you look in the history of the Steem page currently up. However, I did upload the exact same article to Infogalactic, so my previous efforts can still be seen there.
I hope Wikipedia keeps your article up, as it is vitally important people have accurate information about the Steem blockchain. Now, what needs to be done next is the Steemit article needs to be edited to reflect the accurate information of the Steem article. This is also someI tried to do, but got nowhere with the mods at the time.
Very important we overload the ignorance about steem and steemit being the same thing, and HOPFULLY we can KEEP the steem page seperate from being dumped into the steemit page, by creating enough updates and positive ediots and additions to the steem blockchain which CANNOt be said about steemit and Onlythen will people start rto REALIZE just how different the two things are.... non technical peopel can still look at a stack of paperwork and realize these two things are very different even if the names look similar, like if someone were to put bitcoin and bitcoin cash into the same page that would be pretty infuriating.
Agaoin I think the STEEM wikipedia page really REALLy needs to have a LOt of details added
Keeping the Steem page up and full of good content on Wikipedia is up to us Steemians.
Wikipedia is open source so it’s just about lots of Steemians editing and defending the page against anti-Steem edits.
If someone deletes large sections that are relevant and well sourced just undo their changes and explain why.
well done. Your diverse sources should fix the problem. If its taken down again (which I don´t hope) maybe a balanced "criticism" section with for example the rankings you mentioned(in fact, it is a critique, even though positive one) helps to make clear our standpoint.
other "negative" criticism is
"Chohan 2018 argues that the concentration of initial wealth could lead to a concentration of Steem Power and thus to accountability asymmetries and the monopolization of power, which would undermine the original cryptoanarchist vision of platforms like Steemit.
Thewall 2017 conducted a study where he showed that longer, more positive comments with personal information get a higher financial reward than more informational articles and concludes that interpersonal communication rather than quality content provision has driven the reward distribution so far."
I've done some correction of spelling and grammatical errors and included more information re Steem DApps.
Great work! Amazing that we didn't have this already.
You should include more information on Steem DApps and the fact that they can be programmed with the easy to use and very common JavaScript instead of the more difficult C++ and Solidity required for DApp development on other blockchains. JS developers are much cheaper and more available.
Ziemlich cool! Danke für deinen Einsatz 👍
I would encourage everyone to get on wikipedia and undo anti-steem edits by people like Viewmont Viking. We have the numbers to create a great Steem page.
Remember to thanks other people making positive contributions on the Wikipedia page.
Good job! Thanks for taking the time to get this up. I added @steempress to the list of dApps. I think the reference numbers on quite a few of them are off though.
Good idea, a connection to Wordpress might sound important! The reference numbers are not correct in the references list, the references themselves are. Need to look into it later ;)
Power to you!!! I tired to do this back at the end of last year, and got blackballed by the editors of wikipedia who just could not be made to understand that Steem and Steemit were different things! I ended up getting banned for a while because of it. (The mods don't like be questioned...) You can see my previous efforts if you look in the history of the Steem page currently up. However, I did upload the exact same article to Infogalactic, so my previous efforts can still be seen there.
I hope Wikipedia keeps your article up, as it is vitally important people have accurate information about the Steem blockchain. Now, what needs to be done next is the Steemit article needs to be edited to reflect the accurate information of the Steem article. This is also someI tried to do, but got nowhere with the mods at the time.
Its just about numbers. If we get 20 Steemians making edits and blocking negative edits, we will overwhelm any opposition.
Very important we overload the ignorance about steem and steemit being the same thing, and HOPFULLY we can KEEP the steem page seperate from being dumped into the steemit page, by creating enough updates and positive ediots and additions to the steem blockchain which CANNOt be said about steemit and Onlythen will people start rto REALIZE just how different the two things are.... non technical peopel can still look at a stack of paperwork and realize these two things are very different even if the names look similar, like if someone were to put bitcoin and bitcoin cash into the same page that would be pretty infuriating.
Agaoin I think the STEEM wikipedia page really REALLy needs to have a LOt of details added
Great job, now hope that it is not taken down again. We have to defend it and keep improving it :)
Keeping the Steem page up and full of good content on Wikipedia is up to us Steemians.
Wikipedia is open source so it’s just about lots of Steemians editing and defending the page against anti-Steem edits.
If someone deletes large sections that are relevant and well sourced just undo their changes and explain why.
Posted using Partiko iOS
That's what I'm talking about. Finally getting the recognition we deserve!
Goku Pumping Steem by @web-gnar commissioned by @ackza and @surfyogi PRE @artzone
well done. Your diverse sources should fix the problem. If its taken down again (which I don´t hope) maybe a balanced "criticism" section with for example the rankings you mentioned(in fact, it is a critique, even though positive one) helps to make clear our standpoint.
other "negative" criticism is
but lets hope they take it as it is
There is no central control of Wikipedia. It’s just up to lots of us to undo any wrongful deletion
Posted using Partiko iOS
It's about time
Posted using Partiko Android