Putting ass on seats

in #steem6 years ago

I just read and commented upon a post by @fknmayhem about Steem being too philanthropic and even though my comment is somewhat disjointed, the post deserves some comments on it. Have a read and show it a little love with your own thoughts.

One thing that it did remind me to write about (remember my post last night about what is valuable content) is the idea that this is a place that you can do what you want and, write about what you want. It absolutely is but, doing what you want doesn't mean you are going to get the results you may be after.

Too many users drop in on the Steem flower expecting to gather pollen and sweet nectar but are unequipped to do so if they stick to the do what I want philosophy that so many adhere to. This doesn't mean that one has to completely change but it does mean that there are going to be parts that need to be done. In general, everyone wants to be able to be rewarded for doing what they love but the world has created an unreal view of this.

If we take a professional athlete as an example, they spend much more time training than performing professionally. Much, much, much more time doing the support work so that the minority of their time can be spent doing what they love, doing what they get paid for. So, are they getting paid for their performance or, the background work to be able to perform highly? Both, since it is unlikely that you can have the performance without the background. But, you can have the background without the performance.

The hard work isn't a guarantee of return, it is the space creator so that there is the potential for return. When applied to Steem, if you are thinking about being a long-term player/earner, it means learning about and probably writing about things that you may not actually love. The reason is that this community is in a development phase which means, development needs to happen and, that is up to the community.

Right now, we are building the stadiums, putting in the seats, the gates, the billboards and all of the other facilities that will allow skilled players to compete for a large audience of spectators. The only reason those players have value is because of the audience they are able to bring in and the merchandise they are able to endorse while doing so. What they offer to that audience are their skills and, a place to put them on show and in so doing, they engage the audience emotionally and, retention is high.

You may be a skilled player but, the large audience is not here to spectate because, the grounds haven't been adequately developed. Yet. It is up to us to develop this place, not Steemit, not whales, not curation projects; us. Us as individual users. People complain about things like retention but that is only a problem because people think about themselves and say, I am only here for the money. Yes, this is a big part of it but it will never keep the spectators in the stadium.

If mainstreaming happens, there is not going to be enough SP to service all people so the idea of earning for everyone is ridiculous. What is going to retain people is the engagement between users and this lays squarely on the users. You may not like it but, engagement is the foundation of building a community here and keeping people coming back, not votes, as votes are going to run dry for most in the future unless, highly skilled players.

To be a significant part of the future and benefit from the mainstreaming, two real things are needed. Steem Power of course (and even small amounts will matter) and the ability to be a part of the community which most likely at this stage of the lifecycle, requires being outside of the comfort zone. It means installing a few seats into the stadium.

If your blog is not putting ass on seats and compelling them want to come back and sit down again and watch another game, you are not engaging them. This takes work, it takes understanding, it takes investment, it even takes early losses to build the infrastructure before the income and, it is up to you to do. Not me or some curation project to find you, at least in the early stages. And, it takes consistency, a level head, willingness to learn, change, grow and, a massive amount of resilience as time and time again you may put your heart and soul into you work and, get nothing in return. Zilch.

But, for those that take the time and invest themselves (and their Steem) into building this place, the potential to be able to take advantage of the future grows exponentially. The more people that see this as a project that they are part of building rather than a place to earn some money, the better as then they will be forced to realise the truth.

The truth is, the responsibility and success or failure of this place is going to be up to the community who builds it or, tears it down. Shoddy craftsmanship is going to encourage, shoddy players and spectators who do not want to stay and watch. As I wrote on @fknmayhem's post:

Right now, new users come in and see the low quality that earns and says, I can produce that, and they all can. It is competition at the bottom of the barrel.

New users shouldn't come in and say 'I can do that' and be able to, they should come in and be inspired by what they see to attempt to do something but know that it is going to stretch them to do so. They have to come in and realise that in order to play on the field, they are going to have to either already be highly skilled or, be willing to train very hard. What this means is that those who recognise they can't do those two things will still find a seat as a spectator who enjoys watching the game being played.

Right now, this is not the case and people come in, realise they can produce the same quality but find that they are unable to earn on it. Because the quality is what they themselves can produce, they aren't earning and aren't engaging, they leave saying that this place is broken. No, the stadium isn't built, people are putting the cart before the horse.

If you want to use this like Facebook or Instagram, that is fine but, it is already available on facebook and Instagram so, why be here? If you want to turn this place into Youtube or Twitch, fine but the same premise holds. Steem users should really be taking a step back in my opinion and working out that the competitive advantage isn't in the earning, it is in the engagement of users with potential to earn and the realisation of seeing real users get rewarded for skilled content without requiring a centralised authority to dictate terms.

In my opinion, we aren't competing with the other platforms, we are redefining what it means to be an online community with the potential to actually reward those who deserve it. Right now, it is looking too much like the crony communities of banks and governments, the very people most want to be free of.

Freedom isn't free, neither is Steem. You can do what you want but don't expect to get where you want to go by doing what you want to do.

Taraz
[ a Steem original ]

Sort:  

A friend of mine who I introduced to Steemit is already one of the dispirited ones. He's gong to write about 'what is wrong with Steemit' soon. I will be sure to resteem his article as he has little in the way of followers.

I'm quite sure he's going to bemoan all the things you have mentioned here though. You have to vote people up all day, and respond to people, blah blah.. He's done some posts which have gained little attention so far, besides me voting them and @steevc.

I really know what the fuck he expects to be honest. You don't get something for nothing, and you cant expect flocks of fans looking at your articles if you are an unknown.

It takes time to build a following and often, a lot of time. Effort is assumed. The atrition rate is so high because many people who wind up here haven't the foggiest in what it takes at other places.

I am not a reddit user but I remember @acidyo saying about all of the work it took him to be part of that community and, that was for no monetary reward. In my opinion, it is people like him who have an understanding of the consistency it takes and that isn't just in the 'posting' arena.

It takes time to build a following and often, a lot of time.

Your telling me! It does for sure. Not for the impatient.

Reading this, I realized just how incredibly lucky I am to be able to write about what I want without feeling the disappointment of a failed post anymore. It would be incredibly hard to think of something to write out of my comfort zone, so I never strayed from doing what I wanted to do. Just a few months ago I was covering up posts I worked hours on that made .75 with bidbots and resteem services. Then I started writing about a difficult trial our family was experiencing, and I was noticed! I just recently came across a few people who are ready to give up. People whose posts and talent are greater than mine, and I told them to keep going.

Because the quality is what they themselves can produce, they aren't earning and aren't engaging, they leave saying that this place is broken.

That's the problem though. One of those people didn't respond and another one was just stubborn, thinking his content should be able to stand on its own without having to make friends. You know, because Steemit is broken.

I liked reading your thoughts on this matter - thanks for sharing! :)

Then I started writing about a difficult trial our family was experiencing, and I was noticed

It makes a difference when what you write about (comfort zone or not) is authentic. At the end of the day, th few organic curators prefer to upvote humans, not programmed producers doing it for votes.

Very true. It is hard work finding a group to enthrall with ones writing, but one must keep sharpening that pencil and keep refining and redefining till you have your audience captured. Hard work and perseverance is key

You are right in what you express. I am new to Steemit and I like to find interesting and quality content. Many times I am surprised when I see posts, which in my opinion, have very low quality and are highly rated and commented.

Hi taraz. Engagement with other users is key. I see very little of this by the majority and they will learn the hard way. It doesn't really matter what you write about at the moment as long as it's decent. Without engagement with others you are lost.

Hello, very interesting post!
I have already written about this topic, but in Italian. I think that I will soon increase my participation in English.

I'm starting an publishing agency (in Italy), for September it will be online with a website.

I think the main problem of steemit is that there are no readers.

In steemit readers are other authors who try to develop their own steemit strategy (everyone is here to earn as authors). That is, they try to increase their followers by participating through comments. This is not good (the lack of readers) for those who put content (and readers) at the center of their project.

Steemit is more a social network platform than a blogging platform (for technical features). Therefore the main attention can only go towards relationships rather than contents. For those who want to carry out publishing projects, like me, steemit can only be considered as a simple minority element in a business strategy. At this moment I am evaluating the opportunity of this platform in helping (supporting) a professional publishing project.

I am not sure if you have read about other interfaces and SMTs but, there is a lot of potential for publishing platforms to develop as well as a lot more consumers of content to come in. What holds back a lot of viewers is the quality of content available but I see it as a 'build it and they will come' position. Currently we are early in the building phase.

You're right, I'm recently in steemit and I still have to know projects that use alternative interfaces.

For now I refer only to the main steemit platform. Both from the interface point of view and from the point of view of technical functionalities (for roles). In this sense, steemit does not facilitate the reader (the one who has no profit goal) to use this platform (registration, wallet, blockchain, and everything else). Furthermore, the platform is not easy to use to store interesting but old content, etc. (I hope soon there will be new functions in this sense). The editorial business is normally scalable while steemit rewards the content only in the first week (this is good in a social network perspective).
If I am developing professional publishing projects I will have to go where the reader is, I have no alternative to this. And steemit still needs to grow a lot in this sense.
All these things that do not help.

However, I realize my lack of knowledge of steemit. So most likely you can give me some suggestions.

I agree with many things, but isn't the professional athlete thing just a little crazy? Isn't that part of the problem? Yes, we all have to put in work and interact, find our footing, but when you start treating this as a race..doesn't it become just about crunching the numbers, dazzling the crowds, instead of being authentic and original wanting to communicate things we want, we start thinking about pleasing people to gain traction and get attention.

Engagement and interaction also needs to be authentic and honest.

The professional athlete analogy is about the effort requires to actually be very good at something, not just to compete. I know of some people who never compete yet, they want to be experts and they put their effort into being so. A painter for example may never show the world her work but spend all of her time honing her craft.

I like what you said about competing at the bottom of the barrel. That is exactly what's going on right now. a lot of people just come on here and post memes and stuff like that expecting to get paid. More and more people are just selling their votes so I think you are absolutely correct about not having enough votes to go around in the future. People have to create high-quality content. At least I hope so. We need to get a few more big players on here who create high-quality content to be great inspiration to others

We need to get a few more big players on here who create high-quality content to be great inspiration to others

And some big investors too.

Yeah. A celebrity would be great. They would get a lot of support from the community and they would give so much back.

Awesome contribution. Especially I like the comparison with a professional athlete.
I can only agree. There is a lot of background work to do, to increase the probability of a success in the foreground. There is no guarantee but without the background work, your chances are as good as zero.

The work in is like a lottery ticket, have to have one to win. I know a few professional athletes who have been training since they were knee high for years with no guarantee of ever making a dollar plus, the constant risk of injury. Steem is difficult, time consuming, complicated and frustrating but, it isn't close to impossible to be successful here. At least not yet.

Your opinion is enlightening, @tarazkp. I will try to give my blog and this platform what it takes.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.22
TRX 0.20
JST 0.034
BTC 98713.95
ETH 3352.77
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.07