You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Mathematical Incentives Only Work, If The Stakeholders Use Them
I don't know what to think anymore, in one hand it really should be 50/50 and downvotes and all the stuff... Now, if the authors don't earn as much as they value themselves... They can post to facebok. As long as there is a core of witnesses, developers and stinc development steem will attract users. After all we have been decreasing in numbers of active people for a long time but lots of them are coming back for one reason or another.
Marketing is a must, we are developing a project to hit SPS as soon as possible.
Math is one thing, behavior, greed and short-term thinking is another - and as that joke goes for physicists... Steem is not a spherical chicken in a vacuum.
Or self publish as some of us have and will continue to do. :)
Wonder why a slider isn't proposed allowing the authors to decide what the split would be? Then the people posting pictures of their breakfast could allow the curators 50-75% and rake in all the profit curators who care little for quality and more for payout.
Better joke about economists; physicists are more practical than you think.