You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Your vote, squared: not everyone's vote is equal - insight into quadratic voting and why there wasn't linear rewards in the first place
It should literally be the other way around, someone with 100x more money should only have 10 times more influence.
That can't work since people will split their stake. If 100x more money gives 10x more influence then you split it into 100 pieces and have 100x influence instead. The flattest we can go is linear. I agree that quadratic was nutty though
Ah good point, but my statement was just to make a point anyway ;)
BTW, are you stalking me now? haha