RE: Steemit Update [Sep 20th, 2022] : Steemit Engagement Challenge - Applications Invited for Season 5
Why do you think your post is of high quality and other peoples post are not? The truth is that everyone who post in this platform considers his or her article as an article with high quality but we don't get to judge our article. Just as you have illustrated, moderators grade based on what they think the article deserve. In the same way, curators vote based on the fact that they have found the article worthy enough. Instead of calling other peoples article low quality article, try to improve on your own article and build your own audience. Once you post quality article on the platform and people find it attractive enough, you will also get support from both the big and small curators because the platform is always ready to welcome good content. #steem-on
why do I say my post is of high quality, it's natural, it's very natural to look for an account that specifically discusses content that is useful and informative and useful for others. Very little there can only be counted on the fingers. while the posts that I mean are very domineering, so that there are no creative ideas that can be written, because they don't want to look for other topics, afraid that @steemcurator01 won't vote so good content doesn't exist. why do I give my example, because content like mine can only be found on paid channels, I write for insight and also information, if there are users from this platform who want to find technical analysis so easy. what are you writing? it's the same as the majority of accounts, don't look for safety bro, by not trying to grow and think logically. here is not just my content, there is still a lot of content from friends that is reasonable and very deserving of curation than your blog posts, which you think is of very high quality.
Just like I have said above, you don't get to judges if your content is of high quality or not. The people reading through your content are those to judge. So i will advice you to allow the content readers to be the judge of your post my friend. #steem-on
mantap
I can judge my post is of quality or not, I research and I don't just write, and write everyday things that are not useful and become useful discussions as an article. Come on, friends, admit it, content that is topic-specific, has good quality, and is informative and also educative to readers rarely gets votes from the curators, it's only you who post that and it's boring, there's no interest in people reading continuously. good night and greetings jastok
The platform works based on POB hence we also vote based on what we feel the content of the article add to us. If you are not satisfy with this fact, build your own SP and support article that you feel are of good quality. No body stops you from doing that my friend. You write on technical analysis which is good but don't condemn what others are good at as well.
why? You are offended that your content is boring, because I speak honestly? you are afraid that later you will be left out because your content will not be seen again, and get votes like it is now. I'll laugh, the wheel is always turning who is looking for money and not being creative and giving something and benefiting will be over soon, I'm sure of that. And steemit will be filled again by creators with content that is worth reading, not the boring reports you wrote.
You can go ahead to call my content what ever you want my friend, if my content weren't good enough I couldn't have gotten the support i get from the team. Look at my reputation, i didn't start the journey just yesterday. As i have said before, do that which you feel you know how to do best and allow others to do what they can do best too. Your work is on technical analysis, do you think that is all the platform needs? Well, the truth is that everyone has something to offer hence i urge you not to condemn what other users post, because that may be their field of studies and that is what they know best. Currently the team has organized an engagement and because you don't see it relevant you don't participate in it. I have learnt a lot at the cause of this program my friend. Instead of seeking for attention by mentioning SC01 always just join the engagement, you may be lucky too my friend. #steem-on
a small reputation does not matter, as long as we are interested in reading it, there is something new even though the topic is the same, there is useful information in it and can give us insight. but what I see is that the reputation accounts don't deliver what I describe, and their content is monotonous and boring. I'll admit what I said, steemit has nothing that makes us interested in reading it, even the trash you write gets a big vote, because of a great reputation. reputation is useless, if the content of the blog has no quality at all. just admit it, don't be like your samsudi, really ho'oh.
I really enjoy they way you over rate yourself and under rate others. You call peoples article trash and yours a quality article. I will always say this, you can not be the judge of your article because only those who read through it can say weather or not the article is interesting or boring. Diary Game you condemn so often has help a lot of person all over the world to learn new things. This is one of the post that is seen to be more original when it comes to steemit. Via diary you can share the happenings in your area which others will also learn from. My friend if the technical analysis is not favouring you, instead of complaining and condemn peoples hardwork just join the engagement challenge and also share some diary.
mantapu