You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steemit Update [Sep 20th, 2022] : Steemit Engagement Challenge - Applications Invited for Season 5
Leadership never an easy thing to do, as people tend to see it.. @steemcurator01 can not see and do everything. That's is why we have community leaders and curators to do that. I would agree most of the quality contents gets swept under the carpet, but it is not always the fault of @steemcurator01. It is also on us the various users who are opportune to help out in the various communities. I come in peace..
TBH
This isn't exactly the fault of the steemit team. Most of these community curators and leaders doesn't really know the meaning of quality content.
They usually judge based on originality and length. In as much as originality is very important, sometimes originality doesn't necessarily mean quality.
How will you be selecting a post where an author talks about his visit to a firm, boutique, supermarket or shop as quality? Only because it contains original pictures?
What benefit is the content to readers?
What information/knowledge is it passing?
Who gives a f**k on how much you bought a pair of sandals and the Steem equivalent of the local currency?
What benefit is your supermarket review to other readers? Who is ever going to come there to buy stuff?
Yet, this type of contents are usually regarded as high quality and are often being given more attention by community leaders and curators especially when it is made by users with high reputation.
This is why you will hardly see steemit as a reference when you are looking for information on Google because most of the information people look up on Google aren't the type of contents steemit give attention to.
Previously, steemit was not filled with boring monotonous content, such as diary games, steemit engagement, poor quality contests, how do people want to use this platform. While the content will not attract outsiders to visit if there is no benefit at all, even their posts are very very It's really lame, but they hide it, including your own posts.
even posts made by high reputations mostly trash all of its contents, look at 1 month their timeline is boring and boring with their game diary, and always gets a vote from @steemcurator01 I actually want to laugh with this, later it will be a field for making money without good quality content, even originality is not enough, my friend. And newcomers want to join here, they don't have any content ideas. because it is always filled by the games diary all the time. so steemit there won't be a lot of content discussed just a game diary, try to think critically and logically.
You have your right to vent your anger, and trust me it is worth crying about as it is never easy making out time to create content from our busy life schedule in the hope of getting something tangible, but then, you end up with nothing, while there are others with little or even no effort at all get the large support maybe due to familiarity etc.
But don't forget, SteemIt is a social media platform, not a personal blog. If everyone is being supported for their efforts, I think people wouldn't be this salty about it..
We all create content to the best of our abilities and it hurts if we don't get the needed support. But don't forget that steemit is a social media platform open to anyone and any content.
I'm just venting what most people can be creative and don't think instantly and because they follow the game diary, they will get a bigger vote. it's the same as their goal to make money I know this is not a blog, but social blogging. You know social blogging isn't just about your stupid, uncreative diary.
We are on same boat.. My only stance is that its never easy for the likes of @steemcurator01 and @steemcurator02 to fish out all quality content. That's the reason we have community leaders and curators to help bring this content to them.
I feel your frustration too as when you see hefty votes on people's work, sometimes with grammatical blunders, but I have come to accept that I won't always be lucky enough, in my lucky day, I smile too.
And I must commend the even the various community curators, it is never easy for anyone. And I guess everyone has their own definition of quality.
your base is just a licker. you do not provide any corrections so that steemit develops. and I see the contents of your blog, sorry I have to say it is not worth reading.
I'm not frustrated, I'm voicing something that has been missing from this platform, if you look at this platform 4-5 years ago you can clearly see the difference from now. seldom perfunctory content.
or are you afraid, if there is a new rule, you will not be able to write again because you are not competent to write about something useful and of good quality. I laughed with that attack from you.
I never did attack you. But if you see it that way, it is a mistake on my part. Sorry about that.. Thank you for the compliments. Who am I to attack you?
.
hello bro, you compare the quality of your content with mine, you are just a note that people don't need. shame on your timeline full of diaries. who wants to read it, is it informative? just read the title people are embarrassed.
If you look at my writing by looking for gaps in the question mark, I'm not the author of a volume-volume book. I write useful articles and not write useless notes at all like you and your bunch did. what do you provide on this platform? your diary? all content writers run away from this platform because what is appreciated is trash because they rely on reputation not quality of content, what I always emphasize is quality. All of you are nervous when someone breaks the hegemony of trash roaming this platform. I'm afraid that later I don't know what to write, I can only write notes. Don't you have any ideas to write about?
please read this @steemitblog and @steemicurator01
you support steemit to be even worse by supporting useless content, it's time for you to revise your work again.
why did you delete your comment njing?
Please do a rug pull and reveal some examples of the quality content that is being swept under it...
In your definition, what is quality post?
If an Exam is given and a student follows all the instructions and then deliver answers based on questions asked, with correct grammar. Can we say the student did a justice to himself by giving quality?
At the end, the teacher is the one who still determines his marking scheme. Not the student..
But as long as one concern, following the rules and regulations of the various contest set and graded by the moderators. It is deemed a quality post by the Moderators.
I have seen cases where someone got 9.5/10 rating and had nothing whereas those with 8 and 7.5 gets something.. Why?