You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: New Working Group Announcement | Official Election Results
We have no intention on "dragging this out," but also want to ensure that more time is taken to ensure this is done right. The first election was to establish a community appointed working group and many say it was rushed, we believe it is important that these next steps are NOT rushed and instead be done in an organized and well thought out process.
Why the election is rushed?
What's making it rushed?
If there's confusion, why not settle down and make things clear before going into election with a lot of questions and doubts?
Is there any objective or agenda of making the election fast?
Hey ronel,
I am a bit confused by your questions as this is the actual announcement post to the results of said election. As in, the election is over and these are the results. Most of your questions are actually answered in the post itself.
The election was not rushed in my opinion, as it was a do over to the first established working group. But due to some situations in the beginning there was a bit of confusion of what was actually happening, which made some feel it was rushed. This is a miscommunication error on our part and we will be doing better going forward.
The segment you quoted states that we will be slowing down and making things clear... but as you can see, even when things are explained in a post.. there still seems to be confusion.
So, we are going to work on making communication clear and organized going forward and we hope in return, individuals will actually read it.
Oh I see.
Maybe I'm one those confused lol
the election was rushed. wasn't even done on the blockchain. but a centralized discord .
Oh really?
So, I'm kinda bit right on my questions on my main comment?