You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Block-Change You Can Believe In!
However, I do think that curation rewards should at least be set a a fixed minimum. And that minimum, in my opinion, should be 50% of the allocated rewards.
l do agree that if the percentage is to remain fixed (as it likely will), 50% would be far better than what we have now. I should have mentioned that in my earlier reply. The current incentives definitely favor the authors, and disadvantage voters, which discourages people from powering up their rewards (especially w/ the SBD peg broken).
Even just redirecting the early-voting penalty back to the rewards pool as was promised for HF20 would probably help a little, but I don't think it's anywhere near enough.
It's a pittance. The ~12% of rewards are also just going back into the general pool, I believe. So it's not all going back to curators.
I guess if we did the math, based on the numbers I've been using, it would be around 12% of the remaining 13%, which would be 1.56% of the original split. So, we might see a bump to 13.56% of the total payout of posts. Authors would still be receiving 86.44% of the rewards. (Crude math, but math nonetheless.)
In other words - it's an insignificant amount. It would have practically no effect on anything.