You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Ned Talks: Steem, Steemit, and SMTs
Yes exactly. People are also very ignorant to new Tech. It takes weeks to learn how to drive a car. Learning all about Steemit is a way faster process and easier. People are entitled and take it for granted that Tech should be as easy as other stuff that they have become used to.
that is not the problem ... learning is learned ... the topic is what they already have very clear about what this platform is about and they give it a purpose different from that of its creation ... as for example the powerful ones dedicate to the sale of votes ... further increasing the bad distribution of wealth within steemit
No. This is capitalism. Also it creates new value that didn't exist before. Whoever takes advantage of capitalism by work harder and smarter will benefit.
I think the more correct term should be "bureaucratized capitalism" based upon a wealth distribution system that is monetarily politicized at it's best.
What? This was a very confusing comment, but I see you gave yourself a nice self upvote for it haha
There is nothing wrong with that! Especially since you don't seemingly participate with any rewards giving.
I do not agree ... capitalism seems perfect to me and I defend it ... another thing is to abuse the resources that the blockchain gives you ... in this way, if that does not change, and if a better distribution is not made of wealth steemit will end up dying ... in any case if you see it as capitalism is its bad part
It will not end up dying that is impossible. The whole world is looking for a service like this. STEEM will probably be worth $1500 a coin in the near future. No other service comes close right now. Surely no system is perfect but this works for now and it constantly is becoming better and more people are getting involved.
how many people does it involve? a few days ago the 1,000,000 account was created...Do you know how many are active? about 60,000...if a platform as spectacular as steemit is only little more than 5% is active is that something is wrong ... if only that amount is active is that 95% really does not trust ... and the main reason is the bad distribution of wealth ... and if above the most powerful are dedicated to sell votes will continue poorly...
I would like to have your confidence in the future of steemit ... I think that if some things are not changed the future is very doubtful ... and I love steemit ... and I plan to continue on the platform but I do not see a future so big ... but I hope the wrong one is me
I must agee with you. I don't see Steemit as infallible at all and there are many issues that need immediate attention. The longer it gets put off, the less likely Steemit will be the leader in social media evolution. I am about as cautiously opptomistic as anyone can be when it comes to more people embracing Steemit as their goto platform. There will be many more to come.