Sorry bit of a captain hindsight here

Was it not possible to somehow ( sorry I am not a technically advanced person) hardcode the non governance clause to the steemit stack of steem?

If it was possible but wasn't done and presuming there was no clause in the deal between Justin Sun and steemit Inc shouldn't Justin Sun have the right to manage the assets he purchased?

Same as the steem witnesses can decide to hardfork Into a new chain( I hope it doesn't go this way, i think both sides can benefit from the current situation but everybody will loose out long term if it goes that way.)?

Would the communities react the same way if Justin Sun bought the amount of steem on the market to be in same position or would the price increase and money whales would make as a result sweeten the situation to a point where not much would be said which would then direct to the real issue here which I kind of read between the lines in a lot of posts
Steemit Inc cashing in and being the only beneficial for work carried out mainly by witnesses and the community.( Which did so knowing about the existence of the steemit stack and of the possible future implications in case of change of ownership etc of steemit Inc)

I haven't been much on steem for over a year
I didn't like where it was heading at that time came back to have a look as a lot of noise about in the cryptosphere curious how things gone since then? Last time i asked a question like this had my account destroyed by a despotic witness so accusations of the site now turning towards tyranny well just had to have a look around.