You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Why did a post telling people to report bugs make 3,000 USD in upvotes and my actual post about a legitimate security issue that the developers directly thanked me get less than 100 USD?
Why is Kim Kardashian worth more than 99%+ of scientists? Don't be fooled by randomness. accept the role luck can play in earnings and that the average person doesn't understand or care about important issues. As Steemit gets bigger, the quality of the userbase will steadily decrease until only a small minority would care about or understand its underlying technology. This is the fate of all growing social networks. Nothing anyone can do about it.
There is a lot you can do. You can improve the interface so people can find the kind of posts they want. Right now we look in the topics and there is spam all over, and posts which often don't have anything at all with the topic being voted up. Also Trending is the default setting when maybe we should just let people configure an agent and let that agent search for articles according to their criteria.
The underutilized recommended posts feature is quite good in my experience. Probably your mileage will vary depending on your voting pattern.
I agree the "Trending" topic is a bad fit for my tastes personally.
I click straight to new, then start the wild goose chase of guessing hashtags and looking for something related and interesting. Whenever I check trending, other than site updates, I'm usually not interested in anything there at all.
I often click "new" as well and find more options than "trending", but Steem has changed the system so if you vote on things too new, your curation rewards don't count. I just don't worry about that though then. But its another design choice that doesn't work for some of us.
And about your hashtags point, its a shame you can't be sure that later in the day hashtags you looked at will still be listed, you need to be sure to remember them or write them down externally. Even when you click to view more hashtags, ones you saw just a few hours ago are gone.
This is actually an intriguing solution. I'm still skeptical about the nature of the currency in that nobody is spending or risking anything on the transactions.
Totally agree with this, somekind of subthread system should be implemented, just like in Reddit.
I think it's a real problem. I mean are people really getting "more value" from Kim than scientists? Are people really getting more value from clickbaits than actual important articles? No, they're not. Those articles/celebrities and whatever else are getting paid a disproportionate amount for the amount of value they add.
Sure, it's like this in all of society, not just on Steemit. But then before Steem, social media sites did not pay any content creators or curators at all. That was the norm. But Steem saw a problem in that, and tries to fix it. Similarly, I believe as intelligent creatures, we can find a solution that will make things more fair.
It depends on the people. Some people get more value from whatever they get more value from. Science doesn't reach everyone at the same time. It's like with life extension but where the drugs are too expensive for anyone who isn't already rich in dollars. Certain technologies benefit very wealthy people first.
Many people who will come to Steemit have been conditioned by the main stream media to be someone they are not. Steemit gives us the power as a community to over time let us all focus on the really important issues, but that won't happen overnight. We all have to make a contribution to get to that point.
Part of that will be to accept people as they are when they arrive and let the community develop and share their knowledge from that point on.
"Nothing anyone can do about it."
Not exactly true. The direction of Steemit.com can be manipulated by those in charge of the site and the platform in general. A constitution, code of conduct, and changes to how the upvotes and downvotes work could at the very least reduce and slow the onslaught of empty and corrosive "content".
Agreed. If we all sit on our hands waiting for it to 'come good' we'll end up with another dead social media project and a withering crypto currency. The developers are likely making considerable money the way things are but long term the community and the developers need to find a way to allow quality content to survive against shit posting and tit picks.
Step one I think would be curbing the power that early adopters have through abusing their steem power to give themselves additional steam power.
Step two would be facilitating better sorting filtering and provision of content based on what a user wants so that niche content can be linked with the users that want it.
Do you not see the problems in what you just said? This is not a decentralized platform when they have so much control over it. Steemit is pretty much private and Steem is simply stock in Steemit. Steem is inherently inflationary and centralized and acts nothing like Bitcoin. Of there's censorship, then this is no better than Reddit. The problem is with the underlying incentive structure, not the superficial things you mentioned
I think this mentality is toxic, and not beneficial to Steem.
What is important is a reddit or other information hub so that Steemit blockchain can be separate from specific implementations.
Like all major cryptos already do.
I hope the Steemit platform will survive and succeed, but as a user, I also have a right to express intellectual criticism.
Wasn't replying to you which the client doesn't make clear by not nesting comments logically.
Yeah, I hate that.
Secondly Steemit is a blockchain. Different clients can implement it differently. E.g. aggressively censoring chaff
Its unlikely an alternative to the steemit client is viable against the established product and the developers insider positioning with the tech. It 'could' happen, it just wont.
This comes down to the fact that steemit is actually a very bad social media platform. It doesn't have the robust feature set we've come to expect over the last two decades of web 2.0 development.
I do expect it to come but if we don't vocalise our desire for it, the developers won't prioritise the issue. Squeeky wheel gets the grease and all that.
You possibly should have put a cat picture at the top of your original post? ;0)