This Story Is Generated By an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Using OpenAI GPT-2
. . .
Mr. Osborn’s text is as close to the original as any other writer I have ever come across, and is “guaranteed to be accurate”--just like the rest of his work.
Let me put that in a way which will make my prose gleam as well as Mr. Osborn can.
“I.M. This is every writer that I know and I believe.”
II.M. Yes, and every writer that I know and sincerely believe exists.
II.M. Mr. Osborn’s text is the gold standard. The rest of the article
in other ways is the same. He does not publish his texts, he only damages them.
Here Mr. Osborn applies the copyright that the Greeks have for their works to copyright
Mr. Eddard Burns’s. . . and in doing so, makes them untraceable, for Eddard could not have
been unaware that his work was being done. . . . Eddard’s early books had to be translated
in the Greek, and the translators had to spell his phonographic characters correctly.
This is a good thing, for the book was going to cost several hundred
dollars. Eddard was going to copyright the translations he did not want anybody
know about, and he couldn't have done it if he had been born in Greece.
This is all new and strange, and new copyright law, and odd and
uninteresting and “weird” facts, but it is so new and strange that no one can possibly
know for sure, even when they do know.
Today the case is Judge Holmes’ Court who made the first and only original
interpretation of Shakespeare’s law. It was a case of “common sense”--that is, it was
necessarily carried in by argument and proved to be true by experiment.
Now the common sense argument--that Shakespeare had a conscience--is
grounded, not merely in some quaint village pastime, but also in the
literature of other writers--that equally old and well-known and well-used
common sense arguments are all new and strange, but must be ground
to be believed when proven true.
Of course the common sense argument is put out of place, but it is
still applicable, because it is the only one which has any part
in the Tradition. The Tradition is the only one which has any authority,
and it alone can say and do what it does.
It is a Tradition which aspires to be the authoritative standard,
and if the Tradition is to be regarded as established, it must
be accepted and confirmed by the whole body of the legal
institutions. If the Tradition is to be regarded as new and not
confirmed, it has to be amended, and that is the
impulse of the Deity. If it is to be regarded as accepted and
verified, it has to be wedded to Christianity, and that is the
impulse--which is to be wedded to unchallenged authority.
Y.M. What is the Deity's motive for doing things?
O.M. Well, the Deity is in man, and man is man's master. _He is
black-and-white, _and _they are _him. _They make the master black and
confirm the rule, which is: No temperance nor reform--man must away
from manhood. _You cannot temper an old man, he cannot reform him.
He is black, he is light, he is away. There is a reason.
He will not beintothe hoodlums; he is heat, he is away. There is a
reason. When the Temperance boy he treated of the trees,
he mistooked them for teakettle tips and began to hate the
teakettle tips. Then he got cold feet and couldn't walk;
he was so miserable that the Temperance boy asked for a
tea: the old man said it made him cold. The old man said
it did not, and asked for another remedy. The new man asked
for another remedy. The old man said the teak came first, and therefore
the new man had to temper the old one. The old man said it
did not, and asked for another. The new man said it did not, because
the teakettils came first, and therefore the new was to be temper
temperament’s interim. The old man said the teak came second, because
it did not look like a teakettle tip and looked like a new shade
of snow, and so on; and the new was better. Thus, for the
principle's sake,