I don't know, but it seems to me that the big players are keeping everything 'in house', and it's a charade.
Activity (not content), drives the steem price higher...
We small fry get the crumbs to keep us here and working, while 'they' are set up to always take the cream.
If it was a meritocracy, it would still happen - as it should - but content quality would rise to the top, instead of 5 a word posts getting $50 all day everyday...)
I'm not disagreeing with you...Same here, (when needed, last year).
I've never reacted well to people taking things off me.
(and the argument of reward pool is not valid. The reward we get from upvotes are ours...unless someone takes executes an action to change it...
That's taking off me , in my book.
Defending the action 'because it's the code', man is abdicating moral responsibility.
You make good points. I tend to agree with some of them.
so...what are you gonna do?
As for me...I'll take what I can get rather than take actions that would prevent me from getting anything.
have you not seen the down voting to oblivion on my posts this last two days? .....when I've brought this all up ...it's almost as if 'they' are pissed off.... or something...
the top 50 own unbelievable amounts of them................(imo)
Some how I don't imagine that the 'top fifty' accounts are owned by fifty different people. How many do you think? Ten perhaps...or twenty?
You're probably closer, I think...
I wonder in ned and bernie are the same person.
Controlled opposition from the offset, to create activity...?
the whole stucture is a scam, (designed to be) I think - but I also think 'we' have way to take it over....seriously...
Just trying to strategize it out...It will take a while, but it could transform the place...
ned is bernie?
who'd a thunk!
I've often thought that Steemit was INTENDED to be a scam..but somehow it worked.
I don't know, but it seems to me that the big players are keeping everything 'in house', and it's a charade.
Activity (not content), drives the steem price higher...
We small fry get the crumbs to keep us here and working, while 'they' are set up to always take the cream.
If it was a meritocracy, it would still happen - as it should - but content quality would rise to the top, instead of 5 a word posts getting $50 all day everyday...)
I've had some pretty good crumbs in the past....maybe more in the future.
didn't get any crumbs anywhere else..
I'm not disagreeing with you...Same here, (when needed, last year).
I've never reacted well to people taking things off me.
(and the argument of reward pool is not valid. The reward we get from upvotes are ours...unless someone takes executes an action to change it...
That's taking off me , in my book.
Defending the action 'because it's the code', man is abdicating moral responsibility.
Ask the SS in ww2, they used a similar defense...
You make good points. I tend to agree with some of them.
so...what are you gonna do?
As for me...I'll take what I can get rather than take actions that would prevent me from getting anything.
have you not seen the down voting to oblivion on my posts this last two days? .....when I've brought this all up ...it's almost as if 'they' are pissed off.... or something...
nope...haven't noticed.
I have learned the hard way...don't piss off a whale.
You? Piss someone off?
Never !
lmao
Yeah...amazing isn't it?
I was shocked...SHOCKED i say.
Occasionally i start thinking you are more on to it than you look...
of course I am.