You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The definition of vote collusion @cryptopassion et Al.
I don't have to defend myself, you are not the owner of that platform, you are not the creator of it, you are not the developper of it, you are just someone who was lucky enough to buy at the good moment and who is taking pleasure now with downvoting people you don't like.
It is all, dictator is really the good word. The goal of your life becomes to stay here and downvote people you don't like.
You're trying very hard if you don't have to. Anyone owning Steem is to some extent owner of the platform as they have the power to decide on it's fate. I only lost BTCs so far with my steem investment, not sure how that makes me lucky.
Hopefully purging reward suckers like youself will reallocate the money to more deserving and contributing people and will increase the value of Steem.
Everyone dictate to the extent of their stake, that you think my stake deserve the title of "Dictator" is your pejorative.
As you use our private convoy, I will use it also.
Only one sentence from you is enough to show which person you are :
cryptopassion : you are not there to make the rules....
Transisto : I don't make THE rules I make my rules
This becomes really a problem on that platform but I'm sure it will be solved one day and with the help of your attitude ;)
Yes I said that and that's not making a controversial statement as much as it is explaining you how steem functions.