You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: A Case for Stake-weighted Voting?
You are eagle eyed and nothing gets past you. Maybe you should have been an auditor.
You are eagle eyed and nothing gets past you. Maybe you should have been an auditor.
heh :)
My intention was to have some fun with the numbers, seeing as their were a good number of respondents. But the numbers did suggest an audit was required. @emrebeyler has posted recently.